HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/2/2011 Minutes of a Regular Meeting Approved July 7,2011
Town of Los Altos Hills
PLANNING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, June 2, 2011, 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road
1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers at Town Hall.
Present: Chairman Abraham and Commissioners: Clow, Collins, and.Harpootlian
Absent: Commissioner Partridge
Staff: Debbie Pedro, Planning Director; Richard Chiu, City Engineer; Brian Froelich,
Associate Planner; Cynthia Richardson, Consultant Planner; and Victoria Ortland,
Planning Secretary
2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR-none
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Commission Ex Parte Contacts Policy Disclosure: Commissioner Harpootlian had met
with the applicant for Item 3.1; and Karen Devich, an interested party, for Item 3.2.
3.1 LANDS OF AHY, 13500 Fremont Road; File #77-11-ZP-SD-CDP; A request for
a Conditional Development Permit for a 788 square foot single story addition on a
0.48 acre lot (maximum height: 14 feet). CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption
per Section 15301 (e) (staff-Brian Froelich).
Brian Froelich, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for the 788 square foot addition to a
single story residence on a lot with a .4275 lot unit factor.
Reza Ahy, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission and offered to answer questions
regarding the project.
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioners Clow, Collins, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham supported the application.
Planning Commission Minutes Approved July 7,2011
June 2,2011
Page 2
MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED BY VOICE VOTE: Motion made by
Commissioner Clow and seconded by Commissioner Harpootlian to approve the requested
Conditional Development Permit
AYES: Commissioners Clow, Collins, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Partridge
This item will be forwarded to a future City Council meeting.
3.2 INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE GENERAL
PLAN PATHWAYS ELEMENT MASTER PATH MAP AMENDMENT.
Addition of a future off-road pathway connecting La Loma Drive to Rhus Ridge
Road. The location of the proposed future off-road pathway is along a private
right-of-way (off of La Loma Drive) accessing four homes and along the northern
property line of 25265 La Loma Drive. CEQA Review: Mitigated Negative
Declaration(staff-Cynthia Richardson).
Cynthia Richardson, Consultant Planner, presented the staff report to amend the General Plan
Pathways Element Master Path Plan. The proposed amendment would add a future off road path
delineation on the Pathways Map between La Loma Drive and Rhus Ridge Road. The proposed
future off road path is an important connection between La Loma Drive and Rhus Ridge Road
for the area newly annexed into Los Altos Hills.
Commissioner Clow asked if the proposed pathway was absent from the Master Path Plan
Pathways Map because the area was recently annexed. The recommendation would be an update
to the Pathways Plan for consistency with the new annexation.
Eileen Gibbons, Pathways Committee Chairman, confirmed that the Committee had requested
amendment of the Pathways Map from the City Council.
Commissioner Collins felt the request for amending the map was a unique case created by the
annexation of the area.
Chairman Abraham confirmed with Eileen Gibbons that part of the proposed pathway would be
over the existing private road. The remainder would be a native off road pathway between the
two properties.
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING
Richard Herzog, La Loma Drive, stated that the information regarding the private road and
proposed location of the new pathway was inaccurate. The existing pathway, which he allows
neighbors to use, is located through the middle of his property and not along the boundary lines
of the two lots. He did want the proposed pathway easement over the pathway crossing over the
middle of his property. He felt the information reflected in the Mitigated Negative Declaration
was in error because the information related to the pathway across his lot and not a potential
pathway along the property line. The land features along the property boundaries are different
Planning Commission Minutes Approved July 7,2011
June 2,2011
Page 3
than across the property and contain large trees and bushes inhabited by many birds and animals.
Storm water drainage in the neighborhood would be affected and erosion increased by
installation of a pathway requiring removal of the established vegetation.
Commissioner Harpootlian explained that the proposed route recommended of the Pathways
Committee was along the property line.
Richard Herzog stated that his adjacent neighbor, Steve Devich, was a surveyor with knowledge
of the property boundary lines.
Chairman Abraham and Commissioner Collins asked if the wrong area had been examined for
the CEQA study.
Discussion ensued regarding the CEQA study, pathway route, and property boundaries.
Eileen Gibbons stated that the Pathways Committee had walked both the existing trail across the
property and along the fence line where the path was proposed. The pathway would be a native
path and meander around the trees to preserve the vegetation. The proposal would make it
possible to identify and plan for pathways of the future.
Richard Herzog said that the value of his property would be impacted by the future pathway
when his property was sold.
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Harpootlian asked staff if whether the proposed pathway between the properties
was the area reviewed for the CEQA study.
Debbie Pedro, Planning Director, replied that the proposed off road path as denoted on the map
was not a surveyed route but shown as a connection between the two neighborhoods. Site review
and pathway route are done at the time of a major development submittal. The route between the
properties was the area studied for the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Commissioner Clow suggested continuing the item to the next Planning Commission meeting
considering the location of the proposed pathway route, the complication of an existing shed on
the property line, and the actual property boundaries.
Chairman Abraham and Commissioner Harpootlian agreed.
Staff offered to work with Richard Herzog and Steve Devich to review the property lines and
pathway location.
Planning Commission Minutes Approved July 7,2011
June 2,2011
Page 4
MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED BY VOICE VOTE: Motion made by
Commissioner Clow and seconded by Commissioner Harpootlian to continue the project to the
July 7, 2011 Planning Commission meeting.
AYES: Commissioners Clow, Collins, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Partridge
3.3 INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE BARRON
CREEK RESTORATION/MAINTENANCE PROJECT. Annual maintenance of
the portion of Barron Creek located on the south side of West Fremont Road in a storm
drain easement along west and south property lines of 26170 West Fremont Road.
CEQA Review: Mitigated Negative Declaration(staff-Cynthia Richardson).
This item will be continued to a future Planning Commission meeting.
3.4 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 10-1.202 OF THE LOS ALTOS HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE (BASEMENT ORDINANCE). The draft ordinance
amendment includes the addition of a structure height limit for daylighted
basements and a limit to bunker size. CEQA Review: Exemption per Section
15061 (b) (3) (staff-Brian Froelich).
Brian Froelich, Associate Planner, explained that a sub-committee had been formed by the City
Council in February 2011 to review the Basement Ordinance and Grading Policy. In addition to
staff, sub-committee members included: Ginger Summit, Mayor; Eric Clow and Richard
Partridge, Planning Commissioners; Peter Duxbury, Architect; and Mark Helton, Civil Engineer.
He summarized the proposed changes to the Basement Ordinance regarding basement criteria,
basement height, and limiting bunkers to 1,000 square feet.
Commissioner Harpootlian asked how the proposed 27-foot height limit for basements would
function in regard to increased setbacks for estate homes.
Brian Froelich recommended inclusion of a reference to Section 10-1.504 for the applicable
height standard.
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Abraham was concerned over the size limitation on bunker square footage to only
1,000 square feet. He supported the use of bunkers and suggested an increase to a 1,500 square
foot size limit.
Planning Commission Minutes Approved July 7,2011
June 2,2011
Page 5
MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED BY VOICE VOTE: Motion made by
Commissioner Collins and seconded by Commissioner Harpootlian to forward a
recommendation to the City Council to adopt a resolution approving the amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance Section 10-1.202 Basement Ordinance; with the exception that the bunker
limit shall be 1,500 square feet and the height limit 27' or pursuant to the limits of the Height
Ordinance.
AYES: Commissioners Clow, Collins, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Partridge
3.5 AMENDMENTS TO THE GRADING POLICY. Proposed amendments include
modifications to grading limits and require terracing for cuts greater than six (6)
feet. CEQA Review: Exemption per Section 15061 (b) (3) (staff Brian Froelich).
Brian Froelich, Associate Planner, explained the changes to the Grading Policy recommended by
the Basement Ordinance and Grading Policy sub-committee regarding terracing with retaining
walls, accessory buildings profiles, finished floor standards, driveway cut and retaining walls
adjacent to basement garages, and driveway cut and fill related to fire department requirements.
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Harpootlian had concerns with the wording regarding retaining walls and
terracing.
Commissioner Collins felt that a house should be designed to fit the site taking into consideration
Grading Policy limits.
MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED BY VOICE VOTE: Motion made by
Commissioner Clow and seconded by Commissioner Collins to forward a recommendation to the
City Council to approve the proposed amendments to the Grading Policy with the change to the
wording of Item#3 to read"terracing shall be utilized for cuts exceeding six feet".
AYES: Commissioners Clow, Collins, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Partridge
This item will be forwarded to a future City Council meeting.
4. OLD BUSINESS —none
5. NEW BUSINESS —none
Planning Commission Minutes Approved July 7,2011
June 2,2011
Page 6
6. REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
6.1 Planning Commission Representative for May 19—Commissioner Partridge
6.2 Planning Commission Representative for June 16—Chairman Abraham
6.3 Planning Commission Representative for July 21 —Commissioner Harpootlian
7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
7.1 Approval of May 5, 2011 minutes
MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED BY VOICE VOTE: Motion by Commissioner
Collins and seconded by Commissioner Clow to approve the May 5, 2011 minutes as presented.
AYES: Commissioners: Collins, Clow, Harpootlian, and Chairman Abraham
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Partridge
8. REPORTS FROM FAST TRACK MEETING—MAY 31, 2011
8.1 LANDS OF YU, 12697 Roble Ladera Road; File #284-10-ZP-SD-GD; A request
for a Site Development Permit for a 4,963 square foot new two story residence
(Maximum height: 27'). CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section
15303 (a) (staff-Nicole Horvitz) (approved with conditions).
8.2 LANDS OF YONG, 13456 South Fork Lane; File #249-10-ZP-SD-GD; A request
for a Site Development Permit for a 7,337 square foot new residence with a 3,647
square foot basement and an attached secondary dwelling unit (Maximum height:
27'). Other site improvements include a re-graded driveway and a new 240 square
foot swimming pool. CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303
(a) & (e) (staff-Brian Froelich) (continued to a future Planning Commission
meeting).
9. REPORT FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT MEETING—MAY 24, 2011
9.1 LANDS OF RAFFETTO, 14380 Manuella Road; File #75-11-ZP-SD; A request
for a Site Development Permit for a landscape screening plan for a 1,070 square
foot addition and interior remodel approved on August 28, 2007. CEQA review:
Categorical Exemption per Section 15304 (b) (staff-Nicole Horvitz) (approved
with conditions).
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 8:39 p.m.
Respec Ily submitted, /
, ,
Victoria Ortland, P anning Seer Lary