HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.2 Supplement #3 Supplemental No. 3
ITEM#3.2
Distributed 10/24/16
From: Doug Tsui
To: Suzanne Avila;Deborah Padovar; litze Couperus; 'i a i";Kavita Tankha;Susan Mandle;Richard Partridge
Cc: whadayaCawmhcorooration.com;WYanaabay.spec;Jlovdho(ftmail.com;vinnevlam(alomail.com;Tom Green;
dmmb25(aaol.com;Menavano622Ca1omail.com
Subject: Los Altos Hills Planning Commission Meeting October 26th
Date: Friday,October 21,2016 8:38:47 AM
All, I sent the following message in May and I wanted to reiterate my strongest protest to the
proposed pathway plan. It seems that you guys are trying to propose a "path-to-nowhere"
around my property area(as bad as other gov'ts trying to build "bridges-to-nowhere"). You
obviously also had not walked around my property or talked to me in-person about the
feasibility of such a path (a quick live visit would show you that it is not quite possible).
Sometimes common sense should trump over the theory of looking at a map and marking it
with a red pen. I intend to attend your upcoming commission meeting to lodge my deepest
displeasure. Regs, //doug
Members of the Los Altos Hills Town
Council and Planning Director, •
c/o: Suzzanne Avila, Planning Director
I have learned that there will be a May 23 Town of Los Altos Hills Joint City Council and
Planning Commission Special Meeting for a proposed pathway that will be in the rear of my
property. Unfortunately, I will be traveling in the east coast that week and not able to attend
the meeting. I strongly object to such a proposal for the following reasons:
1. My property(10858 W Loyola Dr) line in the rear of the house only extends approximately
10 feet and at the end that there is a row of 8 oak trees;
2. Any proposed path would be within the 10 feet line and right next to my housing structure;
and
3. That the town and I do NOT have any access rights to cross over the Yang property (which
is in the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County and NOT part of the Town)to Eastbrook.
This proposal results in a pathway that dead ends in my property which is totally
unacceptable. Regs, //doug