Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.2 Supplement #36 Supplemental No. 36 ITEM#3.2 Distributed 10/26/16 From: Bridget MoroaR To: Suzanne Avila Cc: Deborah Padovan;suzy,smithr@earthiink.net Subject: Fwd:PROPOSED PATHWAYS RAVENSBURY AVENUE Date: Wednesday,October 26,2016 3:22:22 PM Dear Ms. Avila, Please add this letter from Susan Smith to the agenda packet for tonight's meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, Bridget Morgan Begin forwarded message: From: Deborah Padovan<dpadovan@losaltoshills.ca.gov> Date: May 2, 2016 at 8:41:08 AM PDT To: Bridget Morgan<dmmb25@aol.com> Subject: RE: PROPOSED PATHWAYS Bridget, . Good morning and Happy Monday. As I was out of town last week, I was unable to check whether or not Ry and Suzy's email was in the packet The name was familiar, but I wasn't sure. This morning I returned to work and found their email labelled#11, page 23. So yes,it was included in the packet of information provided to the Pathways Committee on April 25. Ann was very diligent trying to sendme every email that she received. Some may have slipped through the cracks, but we are doing the best we can under the circumstances. Their email is safely included in the file (record). Deborah From: Bridget Morgan [mailto:dmmb25Paol.com] Sent: Friday,April 29, 2016 8:10 PM To: Deborah Padovan <dpadovan@lbsaltoshills.ca.gov> Cc:John Radford<jradford2011(@yahoo.corn> . . Subject: Re: PROPOSED PATHWAYS Hi Deborah,. Ry and Suzy's email was sent to all members of.PWC on Saturday, 4/23. They didn't cc anyone outside of PWC so that is probably why their email did not make its way into the PWC meeting binder. Evidently, Ry and Suzy's email was never forwarded to you until I did today. After receiving it on 4/23, should I have forwarded Ry and Suzy's email to you in order to enter it in the public record?If yes, should I forward to you other emails to PWC members with no other cc's that I received in the run up to the PWC 4/25 meeting? Cheers, Bridget On Apr 29, 2016, at 9:08 AM,Deborah Padovan <dpadovan@losaltoshills.ca gov>wrote: I will add it to the file. If I did not receive a copy before 4:30 pm on the day if the meeting, it was not included. On Apr 29, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Bridget Morgan<dmmb25@aol.com> wrote: Hi John, I am forwarding this email from Ry and Suzy Smith to you because I did not see it included in the emails packet distributed at the 4/25 PWC and placed for public review in the PWC meeting binder. The Smith's home is 23230 Ravensbury Avenue. They are also two of the eight joint owners (four families) of the vacant parcel 10300 Ravensbury Avenue immediately adjacent their 23230 parcel. Thanks. Bridget Begin forwarded message: From: Susan Smith <suzy.smith@earthlink.net> Date: April 23, 2016 at 3:03:54 PM PDT To: <gibbons@gmail,com>, <breene@visuali zesolar,com>, <ramirkin@gmail.com>, <ann.duwe@sbcglobal.net>, <dmmb25@aol.com>, <cronel e @gmai 1.c om>, <warner.time@sbcglobal.net>, <skwelch@earthlink.net>, <denise_craik williams@msn.com>, <rnvhesterman@earthlink.net>, • . <abredo@.gmail.com>, <j imbasij i@gmail.com>, <duwe@sbcglobal.net> Subject: PROPOSED PATHWAYS We think our neighborhood is charming just as it is. Old trees and wild volunteer shrubbery line our roadways giving the area a true feeling of country. That's why we moved here, we like the ambiance. Our property is on the last part of Ravensbury leading to the open space. To accommodate our part of the pathway we would have to cut down 4 40 year old pine trees, 3 forty year.old pink blossoming plum trees,two olive trees that were mature when we moved in 44 years ago, 5.Chinese Pastiche, and a twenty year old oleander hedge. These were all planted to give us privacy that the path will destroy. Additionally our foot traffic is often . families. They walk in groups. They are not going to walk on the path in single file.We do have a few paths in the neighborhood. I have never walked on them myself or seen anyone use them. Please consider keeping our neighborhood as it is. We like it. Thank you, Ry&_.Suzy Smith