Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/1975 (2)PI.A:dgp1r. CrP!TISSION Ton of Los Altos Hills 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, California TUnutes of a Regular Meeting Wednesday, August � 1975 Reel 38, Side 1, Tract 2, 325 to end Study Session: A. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Young, Perkins, Brown, Proft, Ilillestad, Chairman Carico Absent: Commissioner Schick Staff: City manager Robert Crowe, City Engineer Alec Russell, City Planner/%i.lding Inspector Kenneth Pastrof, Planning Commission Secretary Kate Tenney B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of an Adjourned meeting - June 26, 1975 There being no corrections, Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Hillestad, to approve the Minutes of June 26, 1975 as submitted. �btion carried unanimously with Commissioners Proft and Perkins abstaining. 2. minutes of a Regular P'eeting - July 10, 1975 There being no corrections, Commissioner Perkins moved, seconded by Commissioner Bram, to approve the Plinutes of July 10, 1975 as submitted. Pbtion carried unanimously with Commissioner Hillestad. abstaining. 3. P'inutes of a Regular 7'eeting - July 23, 1975 Commissioner Young noted he had left the meeting by 12:10 pm. There being no further corrections, Commissioner Brorm moved, seconded by Commissioner Proft, to approve the Minutes of July 23, 1975 as corrected. Potion carried unanimously with Commissioner Hillestad abstaining. C. APPROVAL OF RULES OF PROCEDURE-: Commissioner Hillestad stated that as a new member of the Commission she found the Rules of Procedure very valuable. Commissioner Proft concurred. Commissioner Hillestad moved, seconded by Commissioner Perkins to approve the Rules of Procedure as amended by Commissioners Proft and Brown. - Vr1'�"cv� ' a PLANVINC COt S1ISSICN, August 13, 1975 �r (Rules of Procedure, cont.) (Ed. note: as cast of the amendments to the Rules of. Procedure were grammatical, the secretary will submit a final edition to the Commission in their next �+acket and delete notation of said amendments in the minutes) D. SPECIAL REPORTS: 1. Presentation by ?tr. Kerry Sieh for Tam Geologist: Commissioner Perkins commended Mr. Sieh on an excellent report. The Commission questioned ?7r. Sieh on the adequacy of the Town's present Building Code, set -back requirements for fault zones, and whether any requirements could mitigate possible structural damage due to future earth movement. City Engineer Alec Russell questioned the Commission on the advisability of restricting a property owner from building within any set back area of a fault that has not moved for millions of years. Commissioner Perkins stated it was not necessary to restrict a property owner from building within any specific fault area, but it is advisable for the Tam and the property owner to be cognizant of the hazard and to design his foundation accordingly. E. CITY CDLNCIL REFERRAL: 1. lands of Jensen, BSA -6047-75, John Riley, Engineer. (Building Site Approval recommended by Variance and Permit Commission; referred back to Planning Commission by Council action August 6, 1975) City Hanger Robert Crowe Gave the background on this property, stating Council had referred it to the full Commission for clari- fication on the "waiving" of Ordinance #180 (and the reason for waiving) and a rare definite means of rectifying the drainage problem. fir. Pastrof apologized to the Commission for the lack of information on the property, stating Staff had insufficient time to submit a report. ?7r. Pastrof stated Staff could give no definite solution to the drainage problem without prior knowledge of the applicants plans for building. fie went on to say the use of the word "waiving" was admittedly a poor choice andsuggested the word "exempt". Discussion ensued regarding the length and width of the private road and the access of the adjoining property owners. fIrs. Jensen, applicant, snoke to the Commission asking why they were held responsible for a drainage problem that another property aver had aquired. - 2 - PLANNING MMSSION , August 13, 1975 (Lands of Jensen, cont.) Fur. John Riley, Engineer for the applicant, took this opportunity to request relief from Condition 6B (a) of the approved Staff conditions (Los Altos Fire Protection District) which requires a 20' emergency access easement. ?ir. Riley suggested a 20' hammerhead turnaround strip as an alternate. Commissioner Young stated four merLers of the Commission had no prior knowledge of this property (BSA's are normally handled at Variance and Permit Commission level) and found it difficult to partake in a discussion with insufficient material to work from. Discussion ensued concerning the drainage problem with the City Engineer noting that any placement of additional impervious surface (which is inevitable for any building) will increase the run-off below. Suggested mitigating measures included dry -wells, fanning -out, and utilizing the 1 1/2 acres of excess property to divert some of the run-off. Staff recommended deferring any specific mitigating measures for the drainage problem to Site Development, as any decision prior to evaluation of the building plans would be less than best information available. Commissioner Young moved, seconded by Commissioner Hillestad, that further consideration on this application be deferred to the next regular meeting of August 27, 1975 and Staff is directed to bring Commission up to date during the interval. Motion carried unanimously. F. NEW BUSINESS: Chairman Carico stated Council has requested Commission to research and advise Council on purchasing the 62 1/2 acres of the Palo Altc Unified School District property. Chairman Carico appointed Commissioners Proft, Young, and Schick as a sub -committee to investigate the possible purchase and give their report at the next Planning Commission meeting. The Chairman also submitted material to the Commissioners on Phase I of the Regional Housing Element, stating the mayor had suggested the Commission attend a ABAG seminar in Oakland on September 5, 1975 to discuss this material. Chairman Carico appointed Commissioners Hillestad, Brown and Perkins as a sub -committee to hold a study session on this material and report back to the Commission at the next Planning Commission meeting. The consensus of the Commissioners was to review the material, attend the seminar in Oakland and discuss the material after the seminar on September 10, 1975. Commissioner Perkins questioned Staff on Conservation Easements as discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of August 13, 1975, noting there was a discrep ncy in the Tour Codes, as the State Code referred to Open Space and the Town, to Conservation Easements. There being no further business, Commissioner Proft moved, seconded by Commissioner Yong and carried unanimously, to adjourn this meeting of the Planning Commission at 10:20 pm. Respectfully submitted, Kate Tenney, Planning Secretary -3-