Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/23/1988PLANNING COMMISSION TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS 26379 Fremont Road kw Los Altos Hills, California Wednesday, March 23, 1988 Reel 125, Side I, Tract 1, OOO-End; Side II, Tract 1,000-050 Chairman Yanez called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. in the Town Hall Coun- cil Chambers. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Present: Commissioners Carico, Emling, Kaufman, Patmore, Struthers, Stutz, and Chairman Yanez Absent: None Staff: Bill Ekern, Director of Public Works; Sally Lyn Zeff, Planning Director; George Scarborough, City Manager; Leslie Mullins, Secretary; Lori Scott, Planning Consultant City Council Representative: Mayor Protem Siegel CONSENT CALENDAR: item Removed - B.1. (Carico, Patmore, Struthers and Stutz) Commissioner Carico requested the minutes of March 9 ' 1988 be amended as follows: On page 3, motion seconded and carried on the Lands of Chris- tiansen, should show Chairman Yanez as abstaining. Commissioner Carico requested on page six, wording be included under discussion of the Lands of Charvez, Lot #1, regarding appeal of Site Development Conditions relat- ing to discussion over safety concerns raised with a circular driveway. On page eight, Commissioner Carico requested re -wording of first paragraph to include Commissioners may make minority reports, they need to state the majority opinion and their own. Commissioner Patmore requested the minutes of March 9, 1988 be amended, on page seven, item regarding minori- ty reports, noting it was not an item on brought up on the last City Coun- cil Agenda. Commissioner Struthers requested the minutes of March 9, 1988 be amended, page one, under report from City Council change --Currie Sanitary Sewer System" to "O'Keefe/Dianne Drive - Sewer District #11". Commissioner Stutz requested the minutes of March 9, 1988, be amended, on page 3, third paragraph, second sentence, change "barn" to '-garage". C. REPORT FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1988: Commissioner Carico reported the City Council on March 16, 1988 made ap- pointments to Environmental Design Committee; discussed format for Special City Council meeting on March 25, 1988; presentation prepared by Dr. Howard Martin on Hale Creek; revised budget; report on Sheriff's contract; salary modification for Planning Directors position approved; discussion �w on general election procedures; setting time for new officers to be sworn in; and report on solid waste proposal study. k.,Mr. Ekern informed Commission that Mr. Vidovich held a meeting with repre- sentative from Quarry and Vidovich's private consultant and representative from Department of Fish & Game, noting he could not attend due to meeting schedule conflict, noting he has contacted Department of Water Resources to look into Dr. Martin request. Commissioner Patmore indicated she was planning on bringing this item up under "New Business" to ask as an Urgency Measure for a letter to be drafted from the Planning Commission to the Department of Water Resources. This item will be discussed further under "New Business". REPORT FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF MARCH 15 & 2 , 1988: Commissioner Struthers reported the Site Development Committee on March 15th approved two new residences for Munsey Development on Mag- dalena/Summerhill; approved landscape plan for Lo Conte on Story Hill Lane; apparoved cabana and swimming pool for Nevolo on Bentley Court; ap- proved landscape plan for Estrin/Carrico on Ursula Lane. Commissioner Carico informed Commission the cabana for Nevolo on Bentley Court was not counted as Floor Area because it only has three sides which she thought the Commission should be aware on how staff interprets Floor Area. Com- missioner Carico also noted the house for Munsey on Magdalena was approved subject to lowering roof pitch. Commissioner Kaufman reported the Site Development Committee on March 22nd approved new residence for Bob Owen Homes on Altamont Road, informing Com - it mission the residence has been lowered and steps down the hill from the %olprevious review made by the Commission; approved landscape plan for Fung on Wild Plum Lane for Swimming Pool, referring to past problems with removal of trees on the property and neighbors concerns; approved landscape plan and driveway modification for Pan Cal on Arastradero Road; approved landscape plan for Bavor guest house on Page Mill Road; approved addition/remodel for Yulo on Snell Court; approved swimming pool, decks and landscape plan for Shockley on Moody Springs Court. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR: PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. LANDS OF ALEPIN, FILE 4CUP 7-37, 11920 Rhus Ridge Road, Continued con- sideration of request for approval of Conditional Use Permit for guest house and art studio Item continued per request of applicant to April 13, 1988 Planning Commissioner Meeting. 2. LANDS OF EYVAZOV, 111635 Dawson Drive, Referral from City Council of New Residence previously denied Site Development Permit by the Plan- ning Commission Mr. Ekern referred to Staff Report dated March 17, 1988 informing Commis- sion the City Council on March 2, 1988 upheld the Planning Commission's �W_ -2- denial of the Site Development Permit, however, due to structural change in the driveway support systems the City Council referred the project back to the Commission for re -review. Mr. Ekern informed Commission the only 4,,alteration is to change the 131 high retaining wall support for the driveway into a series of columns. Mr. Ekern also infomredthe architec tural rendering shows the driveway dropping from the road down to the ga- rage, noting in fact according to the grading plan, the driveway slopes the opposite direction, to drain into the street. Staff recommends denial of the Site Development Permit. The Public Hearing was then opened. Mrs. Karen Emerzian, 11670 Dawson Drive, informed Commission she is the Chairman of the Architectural Control Committee for the Dawson Subdivision asking if the applicant is requesting a variance, noting since she has been Chairman of the Committee no one has submitted plans for review. Mr. Ekern informed Mrs. Emerzian the applicant is not requesting a vari- ance with this proposal, noting it is staff's opinion that this residence may not be best use of land as the applicant proposes to use all the de- velopment area for the residence only. Commissioner Patmore questioned what the CC&RIs say. Chairman Yanez asked Mrs. Emerzian if she had reviewed the plans and if not could she do so now. Mrs. Emerzian informed Commission when she took over the Architectural Committee Mr. Damavandi (Subdivider) gave her only a copy of the CC&RIs and no other documents or procedures, noting the CC&R's indicate that VAeplans for new residences shall be submitted to for review and approval by the Architectural Control Committee. Mrs. Emerzian further noted there are two other members on the Architectural Control Committee who would also review the submittal prior to any decisions being made by the Commit- tee. Commissioner Kaufman pointed out to Commissioners and Mrs. Emerzian the Town has no authority to review or uphold the CC&RIs. Mr. Wendell Roscoe, 12234 Tape Way, informed Commission he received the latest staff report on Monday for review, noting he, the owner and engineer met on tne site Tuesday to discuss possibility of relocating the proposed residence, asking Commission to review revised plans presented to Commission this evening. Mr. Ekern expressed concern over the Commissioners reviewing plans staff has not received or reviewed. Chairman Yanez informed Mr. Roscoe the Planning Commission is not in a position to review the newly submitted plans, noting staff must review for conformance with zoning ordinances. Mr. Ekern suggested the Commission advise the applicant to re -submit his application through the regular channels, noting action the Commission is to take this evening is to act on the City Council referrral. �w -3- The Public Hearing was then closed. �,MOTION SECONDED AND WITHDRAWN: Moved by Carico, seconded by Patmore and then withdrawn to Deny Without Prejudice the Lands of Eyvazov, 11635 Daw- son Drive, for referral of Site Development Permit for the new residence by the City Council MOTION SECONDED AND WITHDRAWN: Moved by Kaufman, seconded by Emling and then withdrawn to Continue the Lands of Eyvazov, 11635 Dawson Drive, for re -design of residence, noting review of new proposal can be handled by Site Development Committee rather than Planning Commission if it meets the Site Development thresholds. Commissioners questioned if there is a time line concern on this applica- tion. Mr. Ekern informed Commission the item has already been denied and now appealed, noting there is no time line concern. Commissioner Struthers stated this application should come back to Commis- sion due to high visibility, and should be routed through the Archtectural Control Committee for their review. Chairman Yanez asked that staff noti- fy the Architectural Control Committee when the new application is sched- uled for public hearing. Commissioner Patmore noted this item should come back to Commission for review. Commissioners and staff discussion what actions the Planning Commission should take this evening. Ms. Zeff informed Commission that the City Council has directed this item be brought back to the Commission for review, noting you must take action n this referral. Ms. Zeff noted the Commission should direct the ap- W�licant to make a new application, and inform staff whether the applica- tion should be handled by the Site Development Committee or back to full Planning Commission. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kaufman, seconded by Patmore and passed unanimously to affirm the original denial of the Site Development Permit for new residence for the Lands of Eyvazov, 11635 Dawson Drive. Mr. Ekern reminded applicant and commission this item will be now handled as a new submittal, all new fees, plans, etc. LANDS OF KRAUSE, FILE OCUP 9-87, 25855 Westwind Way, Request for modi- fication to previously granted Conditional Use Permit for secondary dwelling unit to allow increase in size of unit from 947 sq.ft. to 975 sq.ft. Ms. Scott referred to Staff Report dated March 16, 1988 informing Commis- sion the Conditional Use Permit to allow a secondary dwelling unit was ap- proved by the Commission on February 10, 1988, since that approval the ap- plicant has now requested an increase in the size of the secondary dwell- ing unit by 28 sq.ft., informing Commission Condition #8 of the Condi- tional Use Permit states that any structural modification to the proposed secondary dwelling shall be cause for review of the permit. Ms. Scott recommended that the Commission approve the modification to Conditional Use Permit, File #CUP 9-87 to increase the allowed size of the secondary 44� welling unit by approximately 28 sq.ft. -4- The Public Hearing was then opened and closed with no one speaking for or against this item. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Struthers, seconded by Patmore and passed unaniFously to -approve the Lands of Krause, File #CUP 9-87, 25855 Westwind Way for Conditional Use Permit for Secondary Dwelling Unit to in- crease size by approximately 28 sq.ft., subject conditions of approval as attached to the March 16, 1988 Staff Report. 4. LANDS OF RILEY, FILE #CUP 3-88, 12237 Stonebrook Drive, Request for Conditional Use Permit for secondary dwelling unit (cabana) 570 sq.ft. Ms. Scott referred to Staff Report dated March 16, 1988 informing Commis- sion the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed cabana 570 sq.ft. in size. Ms. Scott noted the proposed second unit meets all the applicable ordinance requirements as per Municipal Code Section 10-1.1107 (1), recommending that the Planning Commission approve the Con- ditional Use Permit to allow secondary dwelling unit 570 sq.ft. in size, subject to Conditions of Approval attached to the March 16, 1988 Staff Report. Commissioner Kaufman noted the conditions of approval do not include the PG&E service meter being served from same meter. Commissioner Patmore noted the color of the cabana should be compatible to the residence. Commissioner Patmore requested that staff send copy of the approved conditions of approval (Site Development) to Mr. and Mrs. Keefer, neighbor of the subject property who had raised concerns over septic fl�leachfields at the Site Development Committee public hearing The Public Hearing was then opened. Mrs. Riley, 936 Lundy Lane, Los Altos, informed Commission Mrs. Keefer at the Site Development Committee meeting questioned the septic leachfields, noting she felt they were too close to her trees and was concerned over their health. Mrs. Riley informed Commission the Site Development Commit- tee discussion revolved mainly around drywells, not septic leachfields. The Public Hearing was then closed. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kaufman, seconded by Stutz and passed unanimously to approve the Lands of Riley, File #CUP 3-88, 12237 Stonebrook Drive, Conditional Use Permit for secondary dwelling unit (cabana) 570 sq.ft. 5. LANDS OF PLANTING, FILE #VAR 3-88, 26726 Moody Road, Request for Vari- ance and Site Development Permit for driveway modification in excess of the allowed Maximum Development Area Ms. Zeff referred to Staff Report dated March 18, 1988 informing Commis- sion the applicant is proposing to add a driveway turnout, relocate the swale where it runs through the area where the proposed turnout will be locatedt and to add paving on the edges of the driveway along Moody Road. 60aw -5- Ms. Zeff indicated this request is for approval of a variance and site de- velopment permit for driveway modification in excess of the allowed maxi- mum development area, noting staff recommends approval of the requested - variance to allow the development on the lot to exceed the MDA by an addi tional 512 sq.ft. subject to conditions as presented in the March 18, 1988 staff report, as this application meets the required findings as per Municipal Code Section 10-1.1107 (2)(b). Commissioners and staff discussed the drainage from this property and ex- isting drainage situation along Moody Road. Commission questioned if it was suggested to the applicant to make any trade-offs for development area (i.e., dog runs, etc.) so as not to increase the development area. Ms. Scott informed Commission it was not suggested by herself or by the ap- plicant. The Public Hearing was then opened. Mr. Planting, 26726 Moody Road, expressed concern to the Planning Commis- sion over the number of accidents which occur at this location on Moody Road, noting they are asking permission to fill in the swale, and install a parking turnaround which will eliminiate the safety hazard at this point on Moody Road. Mr. Planting informed Commission with regard to the Path- way Committee's request for installation of a pathway on this portion of Moody Road would not be logical, noting there is an existing pathway on the other side of Moody Road, noting this portion of the road is very steep, and on blind corner. Commissioners questioned if Mr. Plantings property went to Chaparral Road, V nd if so would he be willing to dedicate pathway along Chaparral. Mr. Planting informed Commission his property does not go to Chaparral. Mr. Don Brandeau, Landscape Architect, explained the staking located on the Planting property, verifying the shape of the turnaround area and location of property lines. The Public Hearing was then closed. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Carico, seconded by Yanez and passed by the foljow�ng roll call vote to approve the Lands of Planting, File #VAR 3-88, 26726 Moody Road, for Variance in excess of allowed maxi- mum development area by 512 sq.ft., subject to Conditions and findings presented in the March 18, 1988 Staff Report (with amendment to Finding #2, to remove the last sentence); and Site Development Permit for driveway modification subject to Conditions of Approval attached to the March 17, 1988 Staff Report prepared by Bill Ekern. ROLL CALL: TY -ES -Commissioners Carico, Kaufman, Patmore, Struthers, Stutz and Chairman Yanez NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Emling (Within 3001 of Planting Property) 6. LANDS OF NEWSOM, File #VAR 2-88, 27420 Deersprings Way, Request for Variance and Site Development Permit for Swimming Pool and Deck ex- ceeding allowed development area Ms. Zeff referred to Staff Report dated March 17, 1988 informing Commis- sion the applicant is proposing to construct a swimming pool, spa, deck �.And retaining wall, which would add a total of 1,214 sq.ft. of development area on the lot, noting tne existing development area exceeds the MDA for the lot by 3,901 sq.ft., total amount will exceed the MDA by 4,305 sq.ft. Ms. Zeff recommended the Planning Commission approve the subject variance request subject to conditions of approval attached to the March 17, 1988 Staff Report as based on the required findings per Municipal Code Section 10-1-1107 (2)(b). The Public Hearing was then opened. Mr. Jack Newsum, 27420 Deersprings Way, informed Commission he has reviewed and agrees with Staff Report requesting the Commission approve his requested variance application. Commissioner Struthers suggested that Mr. Newsum go to the Lacy property on Red Rock Road to look at their swimming pool as it is very similar to the one he is requesting to construct. The Public Hearing was then closed. Commissioners discussed past variance applications which are similar to this request, noting they could favorably find that this application meets the required findings as per Municipal Code Section 10-1.1107(2)(b), based on an established policy by the City Council, as the applicant had received approval for the swimming pool In 1975. �IrMOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Stutz, seconded by Emling and passed unanimously to approve the Lands of Newsum, File #VAR 2-88, 27420 Deersprings Way for Variance to exceed the allowed Development Area by 1,214 sq.ft. with modification to Condition #2, that this application is similar to applications previously approved by City Council, thereby upholding a City Council policy on granting of variances as the applicant had previously received swimming pool site approval, and making required findings per Municipal Code Section 10-1.1107 (2)(b). Commissioner Struthers suggested that the applicant re -design the swimming pool. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kaufman, seconded by Yanez and passed unanimously to approve the Site Development Permit for Lands of Newsum, subject to conditions as listed in Mr. Ekern's staff report dated March 17, 1988. 7. LANDS OF MAY, 10631 Magdalena Road, Request for Site Development Permit for New Residence Mr. Ekern referred to Staff Report dated March 17, 1988 informing Commis- sion this is a request for Site Development Permit for construction of a new residence2 noting this application is before the Commission because of the amount of grading proposed, recommending the Planning Commission ap- prove the Site Development Permit subject to the Conditions of Approval 4ss� isted in the March 17, 1988 Staff Report. -7- Commissioners and staff discussed which trees on the site are determined to be removed for the construction, (noting mostly acacias are being questioned why plans were stamped removed). Commissioner Patmore "Preliminary Not for Construction", and why condition regarding foundation inspection was not included into conditions? Staff informed Commission these plans are not to be used by the Contractor for construction, they are not structural working drawings, with regard to foundation inspection condition it should be included. The Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Steinberg, The Steinberg Group, informed Commission they have reviewed the staff report and agree with conditions of approval as recommended, noting the roof will be fire proof shake, color of residence to be tan - beige; siding to be earthtone stain; and some stone work. Mr. Steinberg noted the landscape plan submittal will include swimming pool and decking, noting they are not requesting approval for swimming pool with tonights application. The Public Hearing was then closed. Commission questioned the amount of fill at driveway? Mr. Steinberg in- formed Commission the driveway follows what driveway exists presently, using natural terrain, and will be at existing grade. Commissioner Stutz requested condition regarding pathway, be modified to upgrade pathway to Type IIB. Commissioner Stutz noted the pine tree on 4W the property is in need of care. Commissioners reviewed the recommended conditions of approval, making changes as follows: #7. modify to Upgrading pathway to Type IIB; Condi- tion #10. to include foundation inspection requirement; #11. to note swim- ming pool not part of this approval; #12. large pine tree shall be maintained which is located near secondary dwelling; and #13. roughen driveway at pathway crossing. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kaufman, seconded by Yanez and passed unanimously to approve the Lands of May, Site Development Permit for construction of New Residence, 10631 Magdalena Road, subject to condi- tions of approval as amended. G. NEW BUSINESS: Update of General Plan Steering Committee Ms. Scott referred to Staff Report dated March 16, 1988, informing Commis- sion the purpose of this item on the Agenda is to update the Commission on the status/progress of the General Plan Steering Committee, noting at the first meeting in January we discussed the need to prepare a question- nare/survey and discussion regarding the use of a professional survey firm. At that meetingt staff was requested to compile a list of questions and issues which might be used to help formulate the questionnaire, noting this list is attached to the March 16, 1988 staff report. Ms. Scott in - rim LM M-42 formed Commission this list was compiled from issues raised by the Commis- sion during their discussion of items they would like to request the Com- mittee to look into, and from staff knowledge of community issues which have been raised over the past severl years. Commission discussed the make-up of the General Plan Steering Committee; who prepared this list of questions, noting they are very concerned the wording of some of the questions, (i.e., slope density, more than one zoning district, clustering, etc.) who reviews any documents from the General Plan Steering Committee - will it go straight to Council without Commissioners review; why are there no members of the Commission on Gener- al Plan Steering Committee. Mr. Scarborough informed Commission the General Plan Steering Committee was appointed by the City Council, noting there are many valuable citizens participating on this committee; with regard to their role, the committee will put together a policy docyument after receiving questionnares back, noting they will not be drafting ordinance documents. Mr. Scarborough in- formed Commission these questions have appeared over and over in the past years in Commission discussions, in EIR reports (clustering, slope density, etc.) noting it does not mean the ordinances of the Town are going to change, we need feedback from the citizens and that is the intent of the questionnaire to be used by the Committee. Commissioner Stutz noted she is dismayed with the Commission comments that these items should not be brought up or discussed, noting we need to hear from outsiders, we need to open up all the issues, need to hear ideas, noting we need to hear if what we are doing is right for our community. 4wcommissioner Carico noted the Committee is a good idea, adding she has served the Town for many years, commenting these same questions keep com- ing up, stressing the need for our Ordinances and policies to remain in place, as they protect the Town slopes, hillsides, openess of ruralness of our community, referring to more stricter ordinances in place in similar communities such as Woodside, Portola Valley, Los Gatos and Saratoga. Councilman Siegel informed Commission the City Council had an item similar to this on the last City Council Agenda, noting let's let the Citizens Committee discuss these questions, noting they will be reviewed by the City Council adding the Committee will get technical help formulating the m questionnaire. Councilman Siegel noted he too has reservations over so a of the questions, but they are for discussion purposes and are good ques- tions for us to review. Commissioner Struthers questioned if outsiders are invited to attend the General Plan Steering Committee meetings, noting she would very much like to attend to hear discussions, asking if Commission could be informed of their meetings. Commissioner Struthers noted she felt it important to have a consultant help the committee with the questions they propose to use in the questionnaire. 2. Annexation of parcels within Urban Service Area on individual basis Ms. Scott referred to Staff Report dated March 18, 1988 informing Commis - 401Z ion Santa Clara County policy requires any person wishing to develop a -9- vacant lot within the Town's Urban Service Area to obtain a statement from the Town indicating whether or not the Town will ask the parcel to be an- exed. Ms. Scott noted in order to advise the County when individual par - 4els request development permits, staff recommends that the following w:Colicy be adopted: 1). The parcel is bordered by the Town on at least two sides; 2). Access to the parcel will be from a street within the Town; and 3). The annexation of the lot appears to be a logical extension of the Town boundaries. Commissioner Kaufman noted he would like to see a different policy, noting #1 is too restrictive; #2 & 3 he agrees (is this a reasonable extension of the Town is a good statement); noting the real issue is if parcels can be annexed with larger parcel. Commissioner Kaufman further noted staff should automatically refer these items to Commission for review. Commis- sioner Struthers concurred, although she felt that #1 &2 should be removed. commissioner Patmore questioned what about the owner, what if they do not care to be annexed to the Town? Commissioner Patmore noted she would like to see statement that owner ask for annexation. Commissioner Patmore in- dicated she agrees with Statements 2 & 3. Chairman Yanez noted he would not be in favor of forced annexation, and concurs with #2 & 3. Ms. Scott informed Commission staff will now refer these requests from County to Commission for review, noting you will not receive plans, just address and letter from County. 4609ASSED BY CONSENSUS: Policy that the Planning Commission will review all annexation requests, processed through the Town. Hale Creek - Letters received from Dr. Martin commission and staff discussed item on the last City Council agenda from Dr. Martin regarding Hale Creek, noting the Commission would like to send a letter to the Department of Resources regarding the Neary Quarry Pro- ject, as there is much concern over the diversion of the creek * Mr. Ekern also informed commission that the letter and all information provided to City Council by Dr. Martin has already been routed to the Department of Fish & Game for review, noting they have also contacted Department of Resources, and have since sent a petition for water rights to the Quarry, noting if the Quarry impounds the water they must have permits through the Department of Water Resources. Mr. Ekern informed Commission any one may register a complaint with the Department of Water Resources, noting it may be official if it were to come from the Town. to MOTION SECMD� Z�f' "Dw"'RIDj Moved by Struthers, seconded by Patmore f to rit� a a request Tirect Ms. uLuu, Department of Resource ing an investigation of Hale Creek, noting there is concern over the Town Owned thirteen acres of park land and residential properties who are con- cerned over activities occurring at the Quarry property. Commissioner Struthers appointed to work with Ms. Zeff on preparation of this letter. Letter should be also routed to Santa Clara County, and Dr. Martin. kw _10= Commissioner Stutz left 10:25 p.m. Ht.,OLD BUSINESS: qW San Antonio hills Annexation Process Commission and staff discussed the Process for the Proposed San Antonio Hills Annexation, noting there is a public hearing scheduled for City Council on April 6, 1988, and a possible meeting conflict with the next regular Planning Commission meeting on April 13th, as that is the schedul- ed date for public hearing with LAFCO. Commissioners questioned how many parcels in the San Antonio Hills Area conforming with our Town's require- ments? Ms. Scott noted there are approximately 320 parcels, noting around 90 are less than one acre. Ms. Zeff indicated that if the Commission wishes to attend the LAFCO meeting, we need to re -schedule our next Plan- ning Commission meeting date. Commissioners questioned if there was great concern or protest at the City Council meeting on the 6th, will this item go to vote? The Commission felt it would be beneficial to hold a meeting prior to the LAFCO meeting to form a policy statement from the Commission on the proposed Annexationt and send representatives to the LAFCO meeting with this prepared statement. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further new or old busisness, the meeting was adjourned to Friday, April 8, 1988 at 3:00 P.M. for Policy Statement preparation on the proposed San Antonio Hills Annexation. This meeting was concluded at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Leslie Mullins Planning Technician tar