HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/1988I ` PLANNING COMMISSION
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, California
Wednesday, May 11, 1988
Reel 126, Side I, Tract II, 000 -End
Chairman Yanez called the meeting to order at 7:32 P.M. in the Town Hall Coun-
cil Chambers.
A. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Present: Commissioners Carico, Emling, Kaufman, Patmore, Struthers
Stutz and Chairman Yanez
Absent: None
Staff: George Scarborough, City Manager; Bill Ekern, Public Works
Director; Sally Lyn Zeff, Planning Director; Leslie Mullins,
Planning Technician
( B. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Item Removed - B.I. (Yanez)
Chairman Yanez requested the minutes of April 13, 1988, on page eight,
first paragraph, under Roll Call, be amended to removed Absent: Commis-
sioner Kaufman.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Stutz, seconded by Yanez and passed
unanimously to approve the minutes of April 13, 1988 as amended and April
27, 1988. Commissioner Kaufman abstained from approval of the April 27,
1988 minutes.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Two
C. REPORT FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 4, 1988:
Commissioner Carico reported the City Council denied approval of the let-
ter prepared by the Commission to the Department of Water Resources to be
forwarded, noting Councilmembers van Tamelen and Siegel thought it was a
good letter and should be forwarded to the Department of Water Resources.
Commissioner Carico informed Commission they did check with the City At-
torney that the Commission could send letter without the City Councils
consent, noting however, Councilman Siegel thought it would be better if
City Council saw all correspondence. Commissioner Carico further informed
Commission under the item Reports from Planning Commission, she reported
to the City Council on the Gossard property at 24810 Prospect Road that
the Commission at the last meeting agreed to the Annexation of this prop-
erty to the Town, noting Councilman Siegel expressed concern that these
annexation requests should be processed not only through Commission but
Council as well. Commissioner Carico reported the City Council approved
pathway project for Bullis School; approved special olympics bike race in
Town; referred a demolition of residence on Elena Road for the Allegras to
the Site Development Committee for determination if a Site Development
Permit would be required; and informed by the Pathway Committee of a path-
way walk to happen on June 4th. Commissioner Struthers informed Commis-
sion the walk scheduled will begin with brunch at Westwind Barn and then
F walk to Page Mill Road/Moody Road. Commissioner Carico further reported
�w the public hearing on the San Antonio Hills Annexation is scheduled for
May 18th; Council held discussion over attendance by members of the Gener-
al Plan Steering Committee; and noted Committee vacancies. Chairman Yanez
requested the item regarding the letter prepared by the Commission be dis-
cussed under Old Business.
D. REPORT FROM SITE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF MAY_3 & 10, 1988:
Commissioner Stutz reported the Site Development Committee on May 3, 1988
continued consideration of a new residence for Bettencourt on Stonebrook
Drive for redesign of driveway and parking area; upheld administrative
site development permit decision for fence on Wubbels on La Paloma Road;
made setback determination for Barnholt on Altadena Drive that the 40'
setback would be from Manuella Road; and approved a new residence for
Charvez on Lot N3, O'Keefe subject to lowering pad elevation to reduce
fill and redesign driveway.
Commissioner Patmore reported the Site Development Committee on May 10,
1988 reviewed a new foundation as per the City Council direction on May
3rd to determine whether a new site development permit should be issued,
the Committee decided no new permit was necessary as the permit previously
issued by the Committee would be sufficient; the Committee approved new
residences on Lots 1 & 2 Altamont Road, with a condition that the
skylights be dark shade because of concerns by neighbors; referred new
residence for Sarraff on Hilltop to full Planning Commission due to high
visibility of residence and retaining wall.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Three
PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR:
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. LANDS OF MUELLER, FILE #CUP 9-88, 27862 Via Corita Way, Request for
Conditional Use Permit for an attached secondary dwelling unit
Ms. Zeff referred to Staff Report dated May 5, 1988 informing Commission
the Mueller's are proposing to add a kitchen to an existing guest suite
connected by a breezeway to their house, making the suite a secondary
dwelling unit under our Zoning Ordinance, noting no other changes are pro-
posed and no site development permit would be required as the proposed
project involves interior work only. Ms. Zeff informed Commission the
entire guet suite structure is 256 sq.ft. Ms. Zeff recommended that the
Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit as requested sub-
ject to the conditions as listed in the May 5, 1988 Staff Report.
Commissioners Stutz, Carico and Emling questioned why the review period
has been revised from 3 to 5 years, noting preference for 3 year review
period. Ms. Zeff informed Commission staff felt a longer review period
would be more appropriate for a secondary dwelling unit, noting if any
complaints were received or any concerns the Use Permit would be subject
to review.
Commissioner Patmore questioned wording of Condition #3, asking also if
this property is at the limit allowed.
The Public Hearing was opened and closed with no one speaking for or
against this item.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Carico, seconded by Stutz and
passed unanimously to amend Condition #2, to three (3) years.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Patmore, seconded by Stutz and
passed unanimously to amend Condition #3 to read as follows: Interior
modifications of the Secondary Dwelling Unit structure, and modifications
adding 150 square feet or less of Floor Area will not require review of
this Conditional Use Permit by the PlanningCommission .; and to ap-
prove the Lands of Mueller, File #CUP 9-88, 27862 Via Corita Way, for a
256 square foot attached second unit as amended.
IN
4..
A
Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Four
2. LANDS OF FRIAS, 28333 Christophers Lane, Appeal of Site Development
Permit for new residence and swimming pool
Mr. Ekern referred to Staff Report dated May 5, 1988 informing Commission
the proposed new residence received zoning approval of March 9, 1988 and a
Site Development Permit on April 19, 1988, noting the applicant is propos-
ing a formal, mediterranean-style structure of two stories, in a neighbor-
hood of generally older, less formal houses. Mr. Ekern informed Commis-
sion the residence is designed to run along the contours, foundation is
proposed to step down hill slightly, surrounded by tall trees and other
vegetation. Mr. Ekern informed Commission the dominant concerns of the
neighbors is three fold: 1) neighbors downhill experience drainage prob-
lems during winter rains, noting it is the opinion of staff as well as the
project engineer that due to the diversion ditches and storm catchment
system proposed by the developer somewhat less water should course down
hill, and instead be directed onto the driveway and down to Christopher's
Lane; 2) neighbors requested poles be placed on site to delineate the
builk of the proposed residence, it was the opinion of the Committee that
the existing landscaping surrounding the site served to mitigate the
height and bulk of the structure and that no field demonstration was re-
quired; and 3) concept of neighborhood, this project is a departure from
the general architecture of the neghborhood, however, the Committee did
not believe that a development of this sort was out of line with the on-
going development in Town, as the Committee did not find that the project
seriously conflicts witih the goals and intents of the Site Development
Ordinance relating to preservation of the community or impact on surround-
ing properties. Mr. Ekern recommended that the Planning Commission uphold
the decision of the Site Development Committee and continue to impose the
original Conditions of Approval as attached to the May 5, 1988 Staff
Report.
The Public Hearing was then opened.
Mr. Charles Fa, 28263 Christophers Lane, referred to his letter of April
12, 1988 raising concerns over drainage and septic system.
Mr. Oscar Sobel, 28266 Christophers Lane, raised concern over the septic
system, informing Comission there is no way this type of soil can accom-
modate a system, and noted much concern over the drainage and existing
problems with the roadway.
Mr. Peter Berman, 28307 Christophers Lane, raised concerns over: 1) size
of structure on a very steep slope; 2) house should be staked and height
indicated for viewing; 3) maximum use of space, existing houses in neigh-
borhood are smaller, questioning if it does fit in with the existing
neighborhood; 4) hedge is shown on site plan to be removed, this is the
4 existing vegetation; and 5) property needs to be rototilled soon as the
�r fire season is upon us.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Five
Mr. Paul Hogan, 2255 Old Page Mill Road referred to his letter of appeal
dated April 25, 1988 and Municipal Code Section 10-2.701 regarding build-
ing siting, view protection, ridgeline protection, asking that the proper-
ty be staked for viewing of height and size of proposed structure; noting
this is out of character with existing structures, it is obtrusive and
will dominate. Mr. Hogan also questioned who the legal owner of this
property is: Frias or Carrasco. Staff informed Commission and public Mr.
qu
Roger Fries is the property owner.
Mr. Paul Nowack, Civil Engineer, with regard to concerns raised by neigh-
bors the drainage will sheet drain and go below to houses into a drainage
system and into Christophers Lane, noting since the site development com-
mittee meeting, plans have been further revised to better the drainage.
Mr. Carrasco, Architect, also informed Commission and public the owner of
the property is Roger Fries, presented Commission with cross sections to
show views of roof from the Hogan property, noting this proposed residence
is under the allowed development and floor areas allowed by the Town, as-
king Commission to uphold the decision of the Site Development Committee.
Mr. Carrasco noted the hedge as shown on site plan is not to be removed.
Mr. Art Lachenbruch, 11820 Buena Vista Drive, questioned what the slope,
net area, proposed and allowed development and floor areas are for the
subject lot.
Mr. Ekern informed Mr. Lachenbruch of the subject lots zoning information.
The Public Hearing was then closed.
Commissioner Carico requested a condition be added to the site development
permit conditions of approval that the hedge and fence not be removed, as-
king if the applicant had any objections to this request.
Mr. Carrasco informed Commission they intend on keeping the hedge, noting
however, the fence is old and should be removed.
Mr. Berman added that he wants assurance the hedge will remain, noting the
fence does not matter.
Commissioners discussed the proposed residence in regard to size, height,
visibility, drainage and septic, informing public the structure is
designed under the allowed development and floor areas, the existing
landscaping will screen the structure from off site, drainage has been
reviewed and approved by Civil Engineer, City Engineer and the septic sys-
tem has been approved by the Santa Clara County Health Department.
V
`, Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Six
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Carico, seconded by Kaufman and
passed by the following roll call vote to uphold the Site Development
Permit approved on April 19, 1988, with a new condition to be added that
the hedge not be removed and to have the site plan corrected to reflect
this condition.
ROLL CALL:
AYES: Commissioners Carico, Emling, Kaufman, patmore, Struthers and Stutz
NOES: Chairman Yanez
ABSENT: None
Neighbors were informed they may appeal this decision to the City Council.
3. Study Session - Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Ms. Zeff referred to Staff Report dated April 21, 1988 giving Commission a
brief overlay of the proposed amendments to the zoning ordinances, staff's
thoughts and interpretations on each item (i.e., declining height en-
velope; driveway light fixtures; one time exemptions from MDA & MFA and
minor variance modifications.
Commissioners questioned staff why the declining height envelope is so
( difficult to administer. Staff informed Commission the declining height
fir envelope is not difficult to administer but complicated to the applicant
and their representatives and difficult to explain, expressing concern
that the ordinance as complicated as it is does not seem to be achieving
the goals the Town had hoped it would, (i.e. reducing bulk, mass and
size). Mr. Scarborough informed Commission the declining height ordinance
as is, is very costly to the Town, due to the amount of time involved with
staff checking applications, costly to the applicant i understanding the
ordinances and having to redesign because of minor conflicts in the height
envelope.
Commissioner Kaufman noted the ordinance as designed creates the struc-
tures to be pushed to the middle of the lot, on steeper lots, thereby in-
creasing the development area due to excessive driveways, noting he raised
this issue a couple years ago.
Chairman Yanez noted he is very much in favor of this proposed zoning
change, noting he too does not believe that the ordinance as is does not
reduce bulk.
Art Lachenbruch, 11820 Buena Vista Drive, expressed concern to staff that
before eliminating the declining height envelope, more investigation
should be made, suggesting perhaps a 20' height allowed at setback instead
of 15' going to 27', discussing other alternatives the Commission and
staff may wish to look into.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Seven
Mr. Ken Pastro£, The Owen Companies, agreed with Commissioner Kaufman
regarding structures being pushed into middle of lot, noting he feels the
subcommittee is working in the right direction on these suggested or-
dinance amendments.
Commissioner Emling indicated the ordinance is designed to reduce bulk,
asking if the ordinance is restrictive enough, what can be done, asking
staff to investigate what other communities (Monte Sereno, Saratoga, Wood-
side and Portola Valley) are doing with regard to height, bulk, etc.
Commissioner Struthers suggested staff could prepare some type of graphs,
illustrations and photos to help the applicants and architects who are in
the process of designing residences.
Commissioner Carico suggested that staff review Mr. Lachenbruchs ideas.
Ms. Zeff suggested the Commission move on to the other items for discus-
sion, noting Commission should go home and think about the subcommittee's
recommendations adding she will forward information from other similar
communities to Commission for review.
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Emling, seconded by Yanez and
passed unanimously due to the late hour to continue the Study Session to
May 25, 1988 at 6:00 p.m.
G. NEW BUSINESS:
1. Commissioners discussed the report earlier given by Site Development
Committee relating to darker shades for skylights. Mr. Pastrof in-
formed Commission there are three shades for skylights, noting there
is a bronze color which is the least obtrusive.
H. OLD BUSINESS:
1. Hale Creek Letter
Chairman Yanez asked if the Commission want to proceed with sending the
letter to the Department of Water Resources.
kw Planning Commission Minutes - May 11, 1988
Page Eight
Commissioner Emling noted many Commissioners have already sent out their
own letters of concern, noting further the letters are supporting the Town
citizens concerns and concern over Hale Creek. Commissioner Struthers
indicated she, Judy and Lee all signed a letter and sent on to the Depart-
ment of Water Resources with their concerns. Commissioner Struthers in-
formed Commission, the Mayor raised concern over the number of letters
being sent to the Department of Water Resources, noting concern over a
possible lawsuit by the applicant. Commissioner Carico informed Commis-
sion it was a 2-2 vote at the Council meeting not to send the letter,
noting much time has gone by, other letters have been sent adding the sub-
ject letter does not need to go forward. Commissioner Kaufman pointed out
that the Commission serves the City Council, noting if the Council voted
that we should not send out this letter, then we should not. Chairman
Yanez noted in his opinion a 2-2 vote is a failed motion, adding the let-
ter should be sent. Mr. Scarborough suggested the Commission wait until
after the next meeting when 5 councilmembers will be present.
2. Chairman Yanez informed Commission he wrote a letter to City Council
as discussed at our last meeting. Commissioner Emling noted the comment
regarding Councilmembers who serve on the zoning subcommittee should be
previous Commissioners. Commissioners were informed positive action has
\/ been taken on this item, noting Commissioner Carico has been attending the
subcommittee meetings, with Mayor Tryon and Councilman Johnson.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further new or old busisness, the meeting was adjourned
at 10:55 p.m.; continue to Study Session on May 25, 1988 at 6:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Leslie Mullins
Planning Technician
4W