HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.2Item 3.2
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS September 1, 2011
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND A VARIANCE TO LOCATE THE
ASSOCIATED GROUND EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK.
LANDS OF PURISSIMA HILLS WATER DISTRICT (APPLICANT: AT&T);
26451 ASCENSION DRIVE; FILE #36 -11 -CUP -VAR
FROM: Nicole Horvitz, Assistant Planneroj?
APPROVED: Debbie Pedro, AICP, Planning Director DP
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:
Forward a recommendation .to the City Council to approve the requested modifications and
variance for the existing/previously approved Wireless Communications Facility, subject to the
recommended Conditions of Approval in Attachment 1 and Findings of Approval in Attachment.
2.
BACKGROUND
On July 17, 2003, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit and a variance for a
Wireless Communications Facility at the Purissima Hills Water District water storage facility at
26451 Ascension Drive (file # 41 -03 -CUP -VAR).
On May 28, 2009, the City Council approved the Conditional Use Permit to be renewed for ten
(10) years (file # 21 -09 -CUP).
The existing Wireless Communications Facility consists of a 28' tall steel monopole at the south
side of the Purissima Hills Water District property. Four (4) antennas are currently mounted on
the pole at 24' from grade. The associated ground equipment is located on an 8'x18' concrete
pad east of the existing pump house, which was previously approved to be located within the
front setback.
DISCUSSION
The Purissima Hills Water District property is located on the west side of Ascension Drive. The
property is used as water storage and an operations facility. Existing structures on the property
include a maintenance building, pump house, storage building, two (2) water tanks, 28' tall
monopole, and three (3) associated ground equipment cabinets. Surrounding uses include family
residences to the north, west, south, and across Ascension Drive to the east.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
Lands of Purissima Hills Water District (AT&T)
September 1, 2011
Page 2 of 6
The applicant is proposing to add two (2) new panel antennas (52" H x 12" W x 6" D), four (4)
new RET'S (remote electrical tilt) one (1) new ray cap, and four (4) new RRU's to the existing
28' tall steel monopole. In addition, three (3) new ground equipment cabinets are proposed on a
64 square foot concrete pad, in the same vicinity as the existing cabinets. .
The proposed modifications to the existing wireless facility are for the new LTE (Long Term
Evolution) 4G technology and will increase data speed to uplink and downlink for cell phones
and handheld devices.
Variance
Per Section 10-1.505 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, "no structure, nor portion thereof,
other than driveways, including necessary backup areas; walkways; minor ornamental garden
structures subject to the height limits specified in Section 10-1.504(f); fences; driveway light
fixtures, limited to one fixture on each side of a driveway, for a maximum of two (2) fixtures per
lot, subject to the height limits specified in Section 10-1.504(h); or underground utility facilities,
shall be constructed, altered, or maintained so as to be located between the property line and any
setback line."
The applicant is requesting to install the three (3) new ground equipment cabinets on an 8'x8'
concrete pad which will encroach within the front property line setback. Due to the topography
of the site, existing development, and open space easement along the west, south, and east
property lines, the locations to place the ground equipment is limited.
Two (2) of the ground cabinets ( 29" H x 24" W x 20" D) will be stacked one on top of the other
and the third cabinet (72" H x 30" W x 36.1" D) will stand alone. Because of the existing
vegetation along Ascension Road, the equipment cabinets will not be visible from off site.
Wireless Communications Facilities Policy
Pursuant to the Town's Wireless Communications Facilities Policy, the applicant has submitted a
3-5 AT&T antenna master plan for the Los Altos Hills and Los Altos areas and coverage map
(Attachment 6).
CONCLUSION
The facility is operating in compliance with conditions of the approved Conditional Use Permit
and the Wireless Communications Facilities Policy. The applicant has submitted a report
demonstrating that the proposed facility will operate within federal RF emissions standards and
guidelines (Attachment 3).
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
Lands of Purissima Hills Water District (AT&T)
September 1, 2011
Page 3 of 6
CEQA STATUS
The proposed application is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15301(a) of the CEQA Guidelines.
ATTACHMENTS
L Original Conditions of Approval(July 17, 2003) with amended conditions #5-9
2. Findings of Approval
3. Radio Frequency Emissions report by EBI Consulting dated August 18, 2011
4. AT&T 3-5 Year Antenna Master Plan & Coverage Map
5. Photo Simulations
6. Wireless Communications Facilities Policy
7. Site Development Plans
Attachment 1
ATTACHMENT 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
LANDS OF PURISSIMA HILLS WATER DISTRICT
26451 ASCENSION DRIVE: FILE W21 -09 -CUP
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
Any changes or revisions to the telecommunications facility or its use shall require an
amendment to the applicable conditional use .permit(s). Additionally, the Planning
Director may schedule a review or revocation hearing before the Planning Commission
regarding the use permit, if any condition of approval is not being met or the facility is
being used inconsistent with the approved use or in violation of Town development
codes.
2. The use permit shall expire ten (10) years from the date of approval. Renewal of the
permit must be requested in writing, with appropriate fees, prior to the expiration date.
3. The monopole shall be painted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, prior to final
inspection of the facility. The equipment units/shelters shall be painted a color, to be
determined by the Planning Department, to blend with the surrounding environment prior
to final inspection of the facility.
4. Landscape screening of the. equipment structures may be required by the Planning
Department upon final inspection, if determined to be necessary.
5. 64 square feet of hardscape shall be removed from the site, in order to comply with the
maximum development area on the property, prior to final inspection.
6. No portion of the ground equipment shall obstruct 'or encroach within the open space
easement.
7. No trenching shall be conducted within the open space easement.
8. No trees shall be removed. If a tree is required to be removed, the applicant shall replace
the tree at a 1:1 ratio with a like tree species and size, prior to final inspection.
9. The radio frequency emissions report shall be revised to include an actual measurement,
not a modeled measurement, prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check.
10. The applicant shall submit a signed agreement to the Town, agreeing that, should the use
be discontinued by the carrier, all facilities will be removed not later then 90 days after
discontinuance of the use or abandonment. The agreement shall be drafted by the City
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
Lands of Purissima Hills Water District (AT&T)
September 1, 2011
Page 5 of 6
Attorney, and must be signed by the applicant and submitted to the Town prior to
acceptance of plans for building plan check.
11. Not later then 30 days after installation and initial operation of the antenna facility, and
on or prior to January 1St of each year thereafter, testing of radio frequency emissions
shall be conducted by qualified professionals and the reports of such testing shall be
provided in writing to the Planning Department, with comparison of applicable Federal
emissions standards. If at any time the emission levels are shown not to comply with
Federal standards, the use permit shall be scheduled for a revocation hearing before the
Planning Commission.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
12. Any, and all, changes to the proposed Site Plan shall first be approved by the Town
Engineering Department. No grading shall take place during the grading moratorium
(October 15 to April 15) except with prior approval from the City. Engineer. No grading
shall take place within ten feet of any property line.
13. Any, and all, areas on the project site that have the native material disturbed shall be
protected for erosion control during the rainy season and shall be replanted prior to final
inspection
CONDITION NUMBERS 9 & 10 SHALL BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED OFF BY THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PLAN CHECK BY THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT.
Attachment 2
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
Lands of Purissima Hills Water District (AT&T)
September 1, 2011
Page 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT 2
FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY; LANDS OF PURISSIMA HILLS WATER DISTRICT
(APPLICANT AT&T); 26451 ASCENSION DRIVE; FILE # 36 -11 -CUP -VAR
1. Because of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict
application of the provisions of this Title is found to deprive such property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification;
Due to the existing development on the site, topography, and the open space easement,
locations for placement of the ground equipment is limited. In addition, the property is a
water tank facility; the proposed ground equipment is consistent with the existing utility
uses on the site.
2. Upon the granting of the variance, the intent and purpose of the applicable sections of
the Zoning Ordinance will still be served and the recipient of the variance will not be
granted special privileges not enjoyed by other surrounding property owners.
If this application is approved, the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance is still served.
This would not be a grant of special privilege because the Town has granted a setback
Variance for wireless proposals with previous applications. The equipment will not be
visible from off site by the neighboring properties due to the existing vegetation and slope of
the property.
3. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property, improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity and
within the same zoning district.
The granting of the Variance for encroachment into the setback would limit potential
impacts to neighbors or property owners because the proposed location of the ground
equipment is the same vicinity as the previously approved ground equipment. The proposed
antennas and ground equipment meet the FCC limits for human exposure and the
installations will be completed to Building Code standards. No detriment to public welfare is
anticipated.
Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME)
Compliance Report
Prepared for:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
c/o The Lyle Company
3140 Gold Camp Drive Suite 30
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
A=10
"QT
" ` _ IL -J LJ 1
CONSULTING
Creating Value for Your Business
Attachment 3
USID# 24152
Site No. CNU 1811
Foothill Expy
26451 Ascension Drive
Los Altos Hills, California 94022
Santa Clara County
37.383470; -122.142450 NAD83
EBI Project No. 62101511
February 21, 2011
Revised August 18, 2011
t.
f
y.
USID# 24152
Site No. CNU 1811
Foothill Expy
26451 Ascension Drive
Los Altos Hills, California 94022
Santa Clara County
37.383470; -122.142450 NAD83
EBI Project No. 62101511
February 21, 2011
Revised August 18, 2011
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU181 1
EBI Project No. 62101511 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.....................................................................................................................
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................................... 3
3.0 AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................................... 5
4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING................................................................................. 5
5.0 RECOMMENDED SIGNAGE/COMPLIANCE PLAN.................................................................... 7
6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................. 8
7.0 LIMITATIONS
Appendix A
Personnel Certifications
Appendix B
Antenna Inventory
Appendix C
RoofView® Export File
Appendix D
RoofView® Graphic
Appendix E
Compliance/Signage Plan
.......................................................................... 8
APPENDICES
d
Ulm EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346 i
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 6210151 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
USID No: 24152 Site No. CNU 181 1
26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio
frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site CNU 1811 located at 26451 Ascension
Drive in Los Altos Hills, California to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless
communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Section 2.0 of this report, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of
RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human
exposure to RF-EME fields. 11
This report contains a detailed summary of the RF EME analysis for the site, including the following:
■ Antenna Inventory
■ Site Plan with antenna locations
■ Antenna inventory with relevant parameters for theoretical modeling
■ Graphical representation of theoretical MPE fields based on modeling
■ Graphical representation of recommended signage and/or barriers
This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation
to all collocated facilities at the site.
Statement of Compliance
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.
As presented in the sections below, based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled
areas on any accessible ground -level walking/working surface related to the proposed antennas that
exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site.
AT&T Recommended Signage/Compliance Plan
AT&T's RF Exposure Policy guidance, dated March 31, 2009, requires that:
I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance;
2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and
3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed.
Site compliance recommendations have been developed based upon protocols presented in AT&T's RF
Exposure Policy guidance document, dated March 31, 2009, additional guidance provided by AT&T,
EBI's understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, and common industry practice. Barrier locations
have been identified (when required) based on guidance presented in AT&T's RF Exposure Policy
guidance document, dated March 31, 2009. The following signage is recommended at this site:
■ Green INFO I signposted at the base of the monopole
BBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803- 0 1.800.786.2346 1
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62101511
USID No. 24152 Site No. CNLI181 1
26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
■ Yellow CAUTION sign posted at the base of the monopole
The signage proposed for installation at this site complies with AT&T's RF Exposure Policy and
therefore complies with FCC and OSHA requirements. No barriers are recommended for this site.
More detailed information concerning site compliance recommendations is presented in Section 5.0 and
Appendix E of this report.
EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346 2
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62 10 1511
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
This project involves the proposed installation of up to two (2) wireless telecommunication antennas to
four existing antennas on a monopole, in Los Altos Hills, California. There are two Sectors (A and C)
proposed at the site, with three (3) antennas that may be installed per sector. In each sector, there is
proposed to be one UMTS antenna transmitting in the 850 MHz and two bands in the 1900 MHz
frequency ranges, one GSM antenna transmitting in the 850 MHz and the 1900 MHz frequency ranges,
and one LTE antenna transmitting in the 700 MHz and 1710. MHz frequency ranges. The Sector A
antennas will be oriented 0° from true north. The Sector C antennas will be oriented 120° from true
north. The bottoms of the antennas will be 23.7 feet above ground level. Appendix B presents an
antenna inventory for the site.
Access to this site is accomplished via a gate in the fence surrounding the water tower compound.
Workers must be .elevated to antenna level to access them, so these antennas are not accessible to the
general public.
2.0 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS
The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of
frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
(IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and
NCRP.
The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon
occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits
for members of the general public.
Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/
controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental
passage through a location where exposure levels. may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see
below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made
fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,
members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not
employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.
Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE
limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary
by frequency to take into account the different 'types of equipment that may be in operation at a
particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled
and uncontrolled exposures.
�' EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346 3
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62101511
USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 181 1
26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 'MHz frequency
range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 850 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 2.83 mW/cm2
and an uncontrolled MPE of 0.57 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations.
Table If Limits for Maximum. Permissible Exposure (MPE)
(A) Limits forOccupational/..Controlled Exposure ,x
r
Frequency Range
Electric Feld £
Magnetic Field
4
Power ensit
Dy (S)
Averaging Time; .:
(MHz)Strenigth
(E);
Strength (H)
2 2
[E] , [H]
(mW/c m2)
"(minutes)
0.3-3.0
614
1.63
(100)*
6
3.0-30
1842/f
4.89/f
(9001e)*
6
30-300
61.4
0.163
1.0
6
300-1,500
--
--
f/300
6 .
1,500-100,000
--
--
5
6
G E
(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure z 4 r
;
h
Frequency Range
Electric Field Magnetic Field
Power Density (S)
Averaging Time,
Strength (E);Strength (H)
2
(Ahm)
(mWlcm)
(minutes)
0.3-1.34
614 1.63
(100)*
30
1.34-30
824/f 2.19/f
(I 80/ )*
30
30-300
27.5 0.073
0.2
30
300-1,500
-- --
f/ 1,500
30
1,500-100,000
-- --
1.0
30
f = Frequency in (MHz)
* Plane -wave equivalent power density
i ure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density
,000
OccupaGonaUCantrolled Exposure
Cenral PopulariawUncontrolled Exposure
100 ---
\
70 \
5-
-
\
i
0.2 -----'
0.1
0.03 0.3 3 30 300 j 3,000 30,000 1300,000
Win
Frequency (MHz)
1.5C0 100.000
Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy
for several personal wireless services are summarized below:
111 EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346 4
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 181 1
EBI Project No. 62 10 151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
' �} � Approx�m'ate
'; Occupational
l less Service
PersonaWirePublic MPE
- Frequency
MPE'j
Personal Communication(PCS)1,950
MHz
5.00 MW/CM2
1.00 mW/cm
Cellular Telephone
870 MHz
2.90 MW/CM2
0.58 mW/cm
Specialized Mobile Radio
855 MHz
2.85 mW/cm'
0.57 mW/cm
Most Restrictive Freq, Range -
30-300 MHz
1.00 mW/cm
0.20 mW/cm
MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous
exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age,
gender, size, or health.
Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of
850-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets)
connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the
transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically
connected to antennas by coaxial cables.
Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate
energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.
This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for
exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly
in front of the antennas.
3.0 AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS
AT&T's RF Exposure Policy guidance, dated March 31, 2009, requires that:
1. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance;
2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and
3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed.
Pursuant to this guidance, worst-case predictive modeling was performed for the site. This modeling is
described below in Section 4.0. Lastly, based on the modeling and survey data, EBI has produced a
Compliance Plan for this site that outlines the recommended signage and barriers. The recommended
Compliance Plan for this site is described in Section 5.0.
4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING
In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofView®
software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site ground -level resulting from operation of
the antennas. RoofView® is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed by
Richard Tell Associates to predict both near field and far field RF power density values for roof -top and
tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the
cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. The models utilize several operational
specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that
can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.
For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T, and compared the resultant
worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65.
The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T, and information
gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers. with. equipment installed at this site.
SINAEBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346 5
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU181 1
EBI Project No. 6210 151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled areas on any accessible ground -level
walking/working surface related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or
general public exposure limits at this site. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T
antennas, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 13.00 percent
of the FCC's general public limit (2.60 percent of the FCC's .occupational limit). The composite
exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 13.00 percent of the FCC's general public
limit (2.60 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each
antenna.
The inputs used in the modeling are summarized in the RoofView® export file presented in Appendix C.
A graphical representation of the RoofView@ modeling results is presented in Appendix D. It should be
noted that RoofView is not suitable for modeling microwave dish antennas; however, these units are
designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground
level coverage.
EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 # 1.800.786.2346 6
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62101511 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
5.0 RECOMMENDED SIGNAGE/COMPLIANCE PLAN
Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially
exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must:
■ Be posted at a conspicuous point;
■ Be posted at the appropriate locations;
■ Be readily visible; and
■ Make the reader aware of the potential risksrp for to entering the affected area.
The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations.
f Informational Signs t
INFO
^_
a n.5w�nw.
INFO 2
r �1NFO. f2M!{TICTN �;.
'
v 9K1iw4LLYUT w5 mi v,pf
at&t
INFO 3
1
I
I �
i.
r
INFO 4
Alerting Signs
Y
i
i r NOTICE
If.'onA'1'lua iPAnlrm,p. ( '
unLnx it
fiv.aPaJe:.nw Capxcn '
�m no Nncvn..u�l
CAUTION
i
CAUTION
j ay'F=is;as
[Cri(wpnxui�pr a�
r- w.m...
VIIAR , ING�'
WARNING
Ka�MwE�q n�.CL ;n
t F.Yn..=.4J.M.+-v i-
vnuluv�'tu4'+.
Based upon protocols presented in AT&T's RF Exposure Policy guidance document, dated March 31,
2009, and additional guidance provided by AT&T, the following signage is recommended on the site:
EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 4 1.800.786.2346 7
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62 10 151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Recommended Signage:
■ Green INFO I sign posted at the base of the monopole
■ Yellow CAUTION sign posted at the base of the monopole
No barriers are required for this site. Barriers may consist of rope, chain, fencing, or painted/taped
stripes. The signage and any barriers are graphically represented in the Signage Plan presented in
Appendix E.
6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency Emissions Compliance Report for the proposed AT&T
telecommunications equipment at the site located at 26451 Ascension Drive in Los Altos Hills,
California.
EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to estimate the worst-case power density from AT&T antennas
to document potential MPE levels at this location and ensure that, site control measures are adequate to
meet FCC and OSHA requirements, as well as AT&T's corporate RF safety policies. As presented in the
preceding sections, based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled exposures on any
accessible ground -level walking/working surface related to proposed equipment in the area that exceed
the FCC's occupational and general public exposure limits at this' site. As such, the proposed AT&T
project is in compliance with FCC rules and regulations.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC. It was performed in accordance with
generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the
same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the
information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the
investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided
to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and Modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared.
in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are
integral parts of this report.. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
0
EBT 21 B Street ® Burlington, MA 01803 0 1:800.786.2346 8
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 6210 151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Appendix A
Certifications
EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 + 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 6210151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos, California
Reviewed and Approved by:
Senior Engineer
Note that EBI's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-
EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering and design
of the building and related structures, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the
structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBI's scope of work.
EBI Consulting
RF-EME Compliance Report
EBI Project No. 62 10 151 1
Preparer Certification
1, Darrell Barrick, state that:
USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
■ I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications, industry.
■ I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations.
■ I am familiar with the FCC rules and regulations as well as OSHA regulations both in general and
as they apply to RF-EME exposure.
■ 1 have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&T's RF Exposure Policy guidance
(dated 3/31/09) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofView® modeling software.
■ 1 have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
='--
ESI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 4 1.800.786.2346
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62101511 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Appendix B
Antenna Inventory
I EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MA 01803 0 1.800.786.2346
RF-EMECompliance Report
EBI Project No. 62 101511
U0DNo 24|S2Site No. CNU|O||
Z646|Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
eq
ATT Al
AT&T
Panel
UMTS 850
250
11.85
Kathrein 742 264
0
4.3
68
20
20
23.85
ATT M
AT&T
Panel
UMTS1900
250
14.65
Kathrein 742 264
0
4.3
65
20
20
23.85
ATT Al
AT&T
Panel
UMTS 1900
250
14.65
Kathrein 742 264
0
4.3
65
20
20
23.85
ATT A2
AT&T
Panel
GSM 850
Soo
12.85
Allgon 7920
0
4.3
75
23
20
23.85
ATT A2
AT&T
Panel
GSM1900
500
15.35
Allgon 7920
0
4.3
75
23
20
23.85
ATT A3
AT&T
Panel
LTE 700
314
12.35
Kathrein 800- 1 0764K
0
4.6
68
26
20
23.7
ATT A3
AT&T
Panel
LTE 1710
599
15.15
Kathrein 800-10764K
0
4.6
61
26
20
23.7
ATTCI
AT&T
Panel
UMTS 850
250
11.85
Kathrein 742 264
120
4.3
68
25
19
23.85
ATTCI
AT&T
Panel
UMTS1900
250
14.65
Kathrein 742 264
120
4.3
65
25
19
23.85
ATTCI
AT&T
Panel
UMTS 1900
250
14.65
Kathrein 742 264
120
4.3
65
25
19
23.85
ATT C2
AT&T
Panel
GSM 850
Soo
12.85
AlIgon 7920
120
4.3
75
24
16
23.85
ATT C2
AT&T
Panel
GSM 1900
Soo
15.35
AlIgon 7920
120
4.3
75
24
16
23.85
ATT C3
AT&T
Panel
LTE 700
314
12.35
Kathrein 800-10764K
120
4.6
68
22
13
23.7
ATT 0
AT&T
Panel
LTE 1710
599
15.15
Kathrein 800-10764K
120
4.6
61
22
13
23.7
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62101511 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Appendix C
Roofview® Export File
EBI 21 B Street 0 Burlington, MAO 1803 � 1.800.786.2346
Map, Settings, Antenna, and Symbol Data Table.. Exported from workbook -> Roofview 4.15.xls
Done on 2/21/2011 at 12:43:12 PM.
Use this format to prepare other data sets for the Roofview workbook file.
You may use as many rows In this TOP header as you wish.
The critical point are the cells in COLUMN ONE that read 'Start...' leg. StartMapDefinition)
if used, these (4) headers are required to be spelled exactly, as one word leg. StartMapOefinition)
The very next row will be considered the start of that data block.
The first row of the data block can be a header (as shown below), but this is optional.
When building a text file for import, Add the Map info first, then the Antenna data, followed by the symbol data.
All rows above the first marker line'Start..' will be Ignored, no matter how many there are.
This area is for you use for documentation.
End of help comments.
You can place as much text here as you wish as long as you don't place it below
the Start Map Definition row below the blue line.
You may insert more rows using the Insert menu.
Should you need additional lines to document your project, simply insert additional rows
by highlighting the row number adjacent to the blue line below and then clicking an the Insert menu
and selecting rows.
Roof Max YRoof Max XMap Max Y Map Max X Y Offset X Offset mber of An envelope
120 100 ISO 120 20 20 1 E$81:$DZ$2:$81:$DZ$200
r*�^;r ^-xaA�
�t Qfiata
Standard Method Uptime Scale Factor Low Thr Low Color Mid Thr Mid Color HI Thr Hi Color Over Calor Ap Ht Mult p Ht Method
. 4 2 1 1 100 1 500 4 5000 2 3 1.5 1
teiina_f&Me to provide an ID (ant 1) for all antennas
.(MHz) Trans Trans Coax Coax Other Input Calc (ft) (ft)
ID Name Freq Power Count Len Type Loss Power Power Mfg Model X Y
ATT Al UMTS 850 26.77835266 1 26.77835266 Kathrein 742264 20 20
ATT Al UMTS 1900 14.05347925 1 14.05347925 Kathrein 742264 20 20
ATT Al UMTS 1900 14.05347925 1 14.05347925 Kathrein 742264 20 20
ATT A2 GSM 850 10.6354008 4 42.54160319 Kathrein 742264 23 20
ATT A2 GSM 1900 5.980725379 4 23.92290151 Kathrein 742 264 23 20
ATT A3 LTE 700 30 1 30 Kathrein 800-10764K 26 20
ATT A3 LTE 1710 30 1 30 Kathrein 800-10764K 26 20
ATTCS UMTS 850 26.77835266 1 26.77835266 Kathrein 742264 25 19
ATT CS UMTS 1900 14.05347925 1 14.05347925 Kathrein 742264 25 19
ATT CI UMTS 1900 14.05347925 1 14.05347925 Kathrein 742 264 25 19
ATT C2 GSM 850 10.6354008 4 42.54160319 Kathrein 742 264 24 16
ATT C2 GSM 1900 5.980725379 4 23.92290151 Kathrein 742 264 24 16
ATT C3 LTE 700 30 1 30 Kathrein 800-10764K 22 13
ATTC3 LTE 1710 30 1 30 Kathrein 800-10764K 22 13
iWm6��ata
Sym Wap Marke Roof X Roof Y Map Label notes for this table only)
Sym 5 35 ACUnit mplesymbols
Sym 14 5 Roof Access
Sym 45 5 AC Unit
Sym 45 20 Ladder
. List Of Areas
$AE$81:$DZ$200
(ft)
(ft)
dBd
BWdth Uptime
ON
Z Type
Aper
Gain
Pt Dir Profile
flag
23.85
4.3
11.85
68;0
ON -
23.85
4.3
14.65
65;0
ON -
23.85
4.3
14.65
65;0
ON -
23.8S
4.3
12.85
75;0
ON -
23.85
4.3
15.35
75;0
ON -
23.7
4.6
12.35
68;0
ON -
23.7
4.6
15.15
61;0
ON -
23.85
4.3
11.85
68;120
ON -
23.85
4.3
14.65
65;120
ON -
23.85
4.3
14.65
65;120
ON -
23.85
4.3
12.85
75;120
ON -
23.85
4.3
15.35
75;120
ON -
23.7
4.6
12.35
68;120
ON -
233
4.6
15.15
61;120
ON-
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62101511 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Appendix D
Roofview ® Graphics
EB1 21 B Street 4 Burlington, MA 01803 � 1.800.786.2346
% of FCC Public Exposure Limit
Exposure Level Z 5,000
F1 500 < Exposure Level <_ 5000
100 < Exposure Level <_ 500
trT R�f�' _ �' w �'a ""@� �' ¢ �,�'h�'sk.� .y�� •-CtF�yr�.i� 4 �"'i'"'sFTyu ro''LCx kik �,"C � "`r,. fit, f d '
Exposure Level <_ 100
`
�.'K .�y. a.�sw g. £`• r ``'r x� a�'^ r' -• �•r { * g 'dc ,.,�,d
% *' I Y F .*� MR-
V a # 5.1 i "� 's •-'
x"� ,U",y t# 4 �->'3 "`r;i *'h 4z"• �. 'k. ---�`
r f s r�' k ..ze s 3 k k; n,<# �,"'a�' .,.i af�u z� 3k£'#
`krzt''rc*S'r: Sr�xl +.x�s.Ya"-nx°x,z''"'x
- �» s.>a'. ,ya P g'§• �+ d A, � h
cSS ,i"k-
rX'dv d s a i tiTs' zs 2. ,e i i �.r�' t fit"'..'
�'i F>3,�,�d 1a 3 _'fit�y�.:.+f y '�:q d r a•`� � � �l! .JL b b � ���
;n c'sW3.3a•`,,�4�.'.,v: ss r . •• i '-k +mss..-+ �-s•.� gs i� z'� '�s s
"R P -6- t"` ,h „X
X
•a1 `£,nva.,��'rZ�' £„,� `-' i. Wim,. � � x`s � 4 � � �' -;"• ,��
x aeu, yyr
g
"Si�'v t yr w,'a' z l5i �,C B. n � r i .� f £'m �'^'+ ss s�” s• s "Y '�
� �� � � 4 � i , �• i+ �C 3§ �' � e'er 5 �,.,��-
tg' g r #
i
h�,��''y "^.{''«d
A
t r @ C Mr., k x n ;f -n
..,/°d pti f t x $ ns z.t u's.Su F t E rs Xi�t vMl 'w 2 'dpi
t
r,. +e } i i k 4: w., e °acs s .+'"a' a s`
i 058,'
qfo b ds x� r mh is e er r a 1 �a e r
an ?- ,fp
rkfi"' ^3rek`
^�i&• �s •r'i �, 2z -a �Ay '�`s- �' u' 'E �'�. � -�. �3s�^� E1W,-
�rg. k`k, T'` ``*"zx ftir .,C , ;' rF,- y $ u- +v; -•k s�, j� ��ya
'. t• �'h. 5 �*3 � F,: r ��33��rtfi r e t+a 4 s s ,z i�" �
z d+ § tts3 q xna-'' 4 SiY` 7a k Ca}y X^a
` �.., i { u � *� � i r •+ � 4 �� ss". -.z �y� (.�+- • � {, � i,i�xr'Sr 4 t� � � �� W. r � d R
'z5i a, z, ,�,%m§�'s-P ,ter y a.a�7„i �.b nL° f� ���s s�'.k'' v',�ql.' s � ��ta � S+C�- ice" sk � r � •
&
' „?��,-�,g�-�i`�°r �s�` e�. r,M ,Srk s`;,��.a� G�x -�-�� `�•`��`„ s `a �€� br � �kr�'���'� � z'e-"z ,# �s.� a
rrx'n
"k.
's
S
rob ,.�P£i:.. s � n, � t .. 1. •.-,�-.. x y,_,.
03 21 4 Roofview: Composite Exposure Levels
Facility Operator: AT&T Mobility
Site Name: Foothill Expy
ATT Arta -ms AT&T Site Number: CNU 181 1
USID Number: 24152EBI
Oftr Wier Arte rias Report Date: 08-18-11 C 0 N S 11 L T i n c
% of FCC Public Exposure Limit
Exposure Level >5
t Exposure Level <_ 5
'�`�' i �" "4' � a•.r- tB °t�t'sk 7`„sn' w k3 i k ,�, T � mss-+ �i`>�° k33ri, ,�s �'� y.7� f T� .� v ,ivi
+b . �a 4i
.'iiiM
"'-
k
m'r'
p ^n s -J ,Fs �� a�' a $ t � ✓� a��-*> .t �i ,,Tit. y�„�,�� � 'n ar r �p�
w3 ,ay?:r f:/�-b ,ct'si Y"+�,f<•y'r. TMr aa•�s F'Z .
21
am "m"' . w; � 'r X. r �„�" a 1� i ti a --W
'a
�s m r
r art �. ,�"#° s`"i ksx '+"5
tow -6- KJ
f akin a*, sa a t k" Six` mac. ; x , s 9Y r k
n 4FsX Iz,St�2 r 5+".4s"r ` d �.5ti k '+k`zrikfe r r"� wa5 is zi U.'
.n'sr'tn
K=wkb"t, �pr'x'd w
R
,tz'�'.
"¢t e � s t � i�,,�,+�� FPP,i,
„{ x. �, �?'yi",..tya a'^y„
'�..c 'u 04 i ' x+5 }v� ia; f q
� r",. ��k"'' '�"'�. `” >i.c.x.5",t�' k. h� +ia '-p t � c-3�wr^ r're 4`,�x Deka•`
0' 2' 4' 8'
Roofview: AT&T Exposure Levels
Facility Operator: AT&T Mobility
Site Name: Foothill Expy
Y'' AT&T Site Number: CNU 1811
�_" AT&T Arterms
I�� � � EBI
USID Number: 24152
EJ
Other [�merArter s Report Date: 08-18-I I
c0 Nsu i.'rIn
RF-EME Compliance Report USID No. 24152 Site No. CNU 1811
EBI Project No. 62 10 151 1 26451 Ascension Drive, Los Altos Hills, California
Appendix E
Compliance/Signage Plan
S EBI 21 B Street o Burlington, MA 01803 4 1.800.786.2346
y'rs
AT&T Arte-Las
ElOff-iar Cam er Arterms
Sector A
r'
i
CAUTION ��'"�
�` Gy Lrwt�ra wwzs
Sector C
01 2,s 418v
Compliance/Signage Plan
Facility Operator: AT&T Mobility
Site Name: Foothill Expy
AT&T Site Number: CNU 1811
USID Number: 24152 �Ik " EBI
Report Date: 08-18-11
C 0 N S L' L V I N C:
Sign Identification Legend
=- Deno[�s AT&T lafon+ia Nonol Sig.
G�enaccs TAT Inlorn,adonal Sign 2
G�ncstet AT&T In(arnuUonal Sipe 3
Gana[es AT&T Infornnanonal Sign a
Ganotas ATYa r NOTICE Sign
ut,
Deno[ex AT&T
CAUTION sign
� �`
Geno[+zs AT&T WARNING: $i�*n
Attachment 4
at&t j
j jf L 'Y L
July 1, 2011
3-5 Year Plan for ATT Project
The following is the 3-5 year plan for the AT&T project located at 26451Ascension Drive in the Town of Los
Altos. Attachment A is a map of all existing sites in the Town of Los Altos Hills. The existing sites are
identified by yellow pincushions. The nearest new proposed sites is south of the City in the general vicinity
of the intersection. of Highway 280 at Mora Drive and Highway 280 at Magdalena Avenue. In addition,
because of the :rapid pace that the wireless technology is evolving it is difficult to provide an accurate
Antenna Master Plan. Furthermore, there are numerous other variables that effect the planning of the ATT
wireless network. With that being said ATT Mobility will be proposing to modify the following facilities this
year: 27299 Ascension Drive and 26379 West Freemont Blvd. The modifications will be similar in scope of
what is being proposed with this application. These modifications will upgrade the network in this area to
provide Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology. In simple terms, LTE technology is the next generation of
wireless network which will provide significantly faster data to mobile devises.
3140 Gold Camp Drive, Suite 30
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
MONOPOLE
MONO PINE
MONOPOLE
COLOCATE
MONOPOLE
COLOCATE
BLDG
COLOCATE
MONOPOLE
MONOPOLE
IXffl fLi1as] =
COLOCATE
BLDG
UTILITY POLE
UTILITY POLE
i
+
LAT 37.3419 LONG -
CN4019
10147301i
I11-280/CROOKED
CREEK
TBD
LOS ALTOS
94022,122092
proposed site
_._-_...__ .-..__....__
_._..,_., _ _._._-_ .__...__—.___._-.-.___
I 1280/LOS ALTOS
LOS ALTOS
LAT 37.35 LONG
CN-923
^
p
10147303
GOLF CLUB
'TBD _
HILLS
94022122
104
_
proposed site
�PURISSIMA HILLS
CN3657
�{ 852301
10067475
WATER
ARASTRADERO ROAD
LOS ALTOS
9402237.38711-122.15303
on air
1-280 & ROBLEDA
LAT: 37.365556 LONG:
CN3659
51771
10067476
ROAD _
AWE LOS ALTOS —
2_6410 DUVAL WAY
27400 PURISSIMA
LOS ALTOS
940221-122.135556
LAT 37 37556
(on air
SF0095
132461
30095750
HILLS
ROAD
LOS ALTOS
94022
LONG 1221452.8
!on air
{
(AWE- DOWNTOWN
(
LAT 37.3775
SF0131,
........
13254'
_ii_
10095849
LOS ALTOS
280 SECOND STREET
6S ALTOS
I 94022
LONG -122 11694
Ion air
{ 1
1721 WHITHAM
1
SF041013265;
10095751aAWE^LOS
ALTOS 11
LOS ALTOS
94024137.3475/-122.09944
on air
(AVENUE
1416 CRISTO REY
SF0416
13268
10095752
AWE LOS ALTOS III
DRIVE
LOS ALTOS
94024137.3325/-122.07389
on air
AWE - FOOTHILL
12345 EL MONTE
LAT 37.36306 LONG -
SF0479
132831
10095825
COLLEGE
1ROAD
1 LOS ALTOS
94022
122.125
Ion air
-_.II-_
-- ._
---
E PAGE MILL
i
SF0525
132911
10095736
280
PAGE MILL ROAD, LOS ALTOS
94022(37.39/-422.1625
ion air
___J2350
AWE FOOTHILL
26451 ASCENSION
((LAT 37.38028 LONG -
SF1811
24152
30095826(
EXPRESSWAY
DRIVE
LOS ALTOS
94022]122.13111
on air
Y
(AWE -1280 /
380 MAGDALENA
LAT 37.51083 LONG
SF1820
1 24186E
100939751MAGDALENA
(AVENUE
LOS ALTOS
I 940241121.97389
ion air
I
LOS ALTOS HILLS
26379 WEST FREMONT'
SF2365
80685
10100717
TOWN HALL
BOULEVARD
LOS ALTOS
94022137.38432
/-122.13887
on air
FOOTHILL
I
AWE-FOOTHILL AN D1 EXPRESSWAYAND
LAT 37.35944 LONG
SFE012
13350]
10097002
SPRINGER
MAGDALENA AVENUE
LOS ALTOS
94024
122.09472
Ion air
AWE - FOOTHILL AND)
j
SFE016
13351
10097003
GRANT2055
GRANT ROAD
!LOS ALTOS
94024
37.34194/-122.07194
Ion air
E
'INTERSECTION OF
I
E37.36007
CN3707
j 85283
100674301
PG&E
PORTLAND ROAD
LOS ALTOS
94024
/-122.07773
on air
EL MONTE ROAD &
LAT.-3-7.-36-44 LONG:
CN3665
1096951
10067434�SUMMERHILL
1040 BORDER ROAD
(LOS ALT05
940241122.10443
,proposed site
AT&T Proprietary
(Internal Use
Only)
Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T
companies
except under written agreement
MONOPOLE
MONO PINE
MONOPOLE
COLOCATE
MONOPOLE
COLOCATE
BLDG
COLOCATE
MONOPOLE
MONOPOLE
IXffl fLi1as] =
COLOCATE
BLDG
UTILITY POLE
UTILITY POLE
Coverage Without The Proposed Site - CNU1811 February 25, 2011
Coverage With Proposed Site - CN U 18 i 1 at 26 ft February 25, 2011
Orr"
y
.r
VVA� Y f -
i7 �f"'�. •- � j _ t s. `ti . ''' its,:
_'►- � , i xx.-.tit � , ;�r a"
Z
�i`''
JUR
view from Anacapa Drive lookirg easr at site
Attachment 6
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS LOSAL SIIiLLs
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Phone: (650) 941-7222
www.losaltoshills.ca.gov CALIFORNIA
Wireless Communications Facilities Policy
Amended 10/12%2006
Code Sections
Section 10-1.703 (h)(2) of the Zoning Ordinance allows service uses, including "communications
facilities", to be permitted in the Town if a Conditional Use Permit is granted by the Planning
Commission and City Council. Section 10-1.1007 (1) of the Code outlines findings which must
be made to approve a use permit, including the proper location of the use or facility relative to
others in the vicinity, the adequacy of the site to accommodate the use, and that the facility or use
will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties.
Intent:
The purpose of this policy is to outline the desired criteria for siting of wireless communications
facilities, generally including monopoles, related antennas, and equipment shelters. As the
Town's land use is virtually entirely residential, wireless communications facilities will be most
appropriately located on public or institutional sites existing within the Town. Colocation,
location on or near existing buildings, and landscape screening will be desired to minimize the
visual impacts of the facilities on neighbors and the public.
Policy:
1. Priorities for siting - Wireless communication facilities shall generally be located on
properties with priority as follows:
a. Town -owned properties
b. Foothill College
c. Water tanks
d. Other public or quasi -public facilities, such as schools or churches
e. Residential properties of at least ten (10) acres
2. Siting on residential parcels - Wireless communication facilities may be permitted on
properties used for residential purposes or vacant parcels intended for residential property
owner provides written consent and significant visual impacts are mitigated.
3. Colocation — Colocation of wireless communication facilities with other facilities is
encouraged to the maximum extend feasible, as long as the colocation is technologically
compatible and does not substantially increase visual impacts. The Town will generally
require as a condition of approval for any conditional use permit that the applicant permit
colocation of other facilities, subject to technological constraints and Town review.
Policy: Wireless Communication Facilities
Page 2
3a. Applications for colocation on an existing wireless communications facility shall be subject
to an administrative review provided that the following requirement is met:
® The colocated antennas and ground equipment shall be mounted or installed
within an existing tower, building, or structure where the physical appearance of
the existing facility is not altered to accommodate the additional antennas and
equipment.
4. Landscape screening and color - Landscape screening shall be required by the Town to
minimize the visual impacts of wireless communication facilities. Poles, antennas, and
equipment buildings should be painted to blend with the surrounding environment and/or
buildings to further minimize visual impacts.
5. Environmental review - A Negative Declaration will typically be prepared for review of
proposed wireless communication facilities, with special attention to the visual impacts of the
facilities. Categorical exemptions may be used where facilities are colocated with or would be
minimal additions to existing structures, with negligible additional visual impact.
6. Antenna master plans — Any applicant for a wireless communication facility site shall submit
applications, to the best of their knowledge, for all sites anticipated to be required by the
carrier for a three (3) to five (5) year period, and the request shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission and the City Council as a master plan application.
7. Terms of permits and abandonment of sites — Conditional use permits for wireless
communications facilities shall be established for periods not to exceed five (5) years, at
which time renewal of the permit must be requested by the applicant. More frequent review of
the operation of the permit may be made a condition of approval. Approval will also require a
written agreement from the applicant that, should the use be discontinued by the carrier, all
facilities will be removed not later then ninety (90) days after discontinuance of the use or
abandonment. Such a provision shall also be included in any lease with the Town for use of
Town lands for wireless communications facilities. The Town may require bonding or other
surety to assure the removal of such facilities.
8. Wireless communication firms shall, at the time of application for permits, demonstrate efforts
which have been mad to inform neighboring residents of the proposed facilities, such as
conducting meetings, or mailing fact sheets and/or letters, etc ... to neighbors.
9. The Planning Director is authorized to reduce or waive permit fees for any wireless
communications facility that is proven to expand wireless coverage in the Town and is
structurally capable of colocation.
10. The Planning Director is authorized to administratively approve portable wireless
communications facilities also known as cell on wheels or COWS on certain properties as
specified in Policy #1 on a temporary basis.