HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.1ITEM 3.1
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS December 6, 2012
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
RE: APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AMENDMENT TO SHOW A CORRECTED
GEOLOGIC FAULT TRACE: LANDS OF WALLACE, STONEBROOK DRIVE
(ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 336-23-020 & 021). FILE #137-11 MISC.
FROM: Cynthia Richardson, Consulting Planner (T-.
APPROVED BY: Debbie Pedro, AICP, Planning Director 3R
RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission:
Forward a recommendation that the City Council approve the requested Final Map
Amendment, based on the findings in Attachment #l, subject to the conditions . in -
Attachment #2.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Final Map Amendment of Parcel Map. 445 maps
56 as it relates to only his parcel in the two lot subdivision. The Subdivision was
approved in 1978 (PM 445 M56, Recorded July 18, 1978). The map originally located
the Monta Vista Fault bisecting the property in an east west direction, further to the north
than currently found. During the Town Geologist review it became clear that test
trenches located in the area of the former location, found that Franciscan Bedrock
materials were not present as previously thought and no fault contacts were found. - New
trenches located further south, bisecting the panhandle, show materials consistent with
the Monta Vista Fault trace.
FINAL MAP AMENDMENT REVIEW
A property owner can submit an application to proceed with a map amendment. under
Government Code Section. 66469(f). The code section provides that a final map may be
amended to correct the map as long as it does not impose any additional burden on the
present owners of the property and does not alter any right, title, or interest in the real
property reflected on the record map.
In order to approve the map, the Planning Commission must determine that the project is
consistent with the General Plan, Subdivision and Zoning Regulations, .and that this
modification does not alter any right, title, or interest in the property and that the map as
modified conforms to the provisions of Government Code Section 66474.
Neighboring residents and property owners within 500 feet of the site have been notified
of the public hearing.
Lands of Wallace
December 6, 2012
Page 2 of 3
Geotechnical Review
The Town's Geotechnical Consultant, Cotton, Shires and Associates reviewed the
proposed Final Map Amendment and Supplemental Geologic Assessment (letter -report)
prepared by John T. O'Rourke, dated December 13, 2011. Cotton, Shires and Associates
reported that the Project Geotechnical Consultant has adequately completed the
additional subsurface investigation suggested in their previous review and based on the
site data they have no geologic objections to the depiction of the proposed Morita Vista
fault zone modification and associated setback illustrations (Attachment #2)
Public Comments
The neighbor to the west of the project site, Mr. Wilkerson, has contacted staff with
questions about the relocated fault trace however no written correspondence has been
submitted at this time.
CONCLUSIONS
Staff has concluded that, as documented in the recommended findings of approval, the
proposed subdivision is in compliance with the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is categorically exempt under Section 15305, Class 5 consists of minor
alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20%. The
property has been determined to have a 14% slope.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Recommended Findings for map amendment
2. Recommended Conditions of approval
3. Cotton, Shires and Associates report, July 13, 2011
4. Final Map Amendment plan set (Commission only)
Lands of Wallace ATTACHMENT 1
December 6, 2012
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR AMENDMENT TO FINAL MAP PM445 M56.
LANDS OF WALLACE, STONEBROOK DRIVE
(APN #'S 336-23-020 & 021)
FILE #137-11-MISC
1. The modifications to the Final Map, Parcel Map 445 maps 56, which modify the
Monta Vista Fault trace, are appropriate and necessary due to the Town Geologist
review where he found that Franciscan Bedrock materials were not present as
previously thought and new trenches located further south, bisecting the
panhandle, show materials consistent with the Morita Vista Fault trace.
2. The property owner is not subjected to additional burdens on the property by this
Final Map Amendment. A .Fault trace currently exists on the property and has
been determined to not be in the original location. The new location is within the
panhandle and is less of a burden to the overall development of the property.,.
3. The modification to the Final Map does not alter any right, title or interest in the
property. No change in property ownership will occur with this project.
4. The map as modified is consistent with the Town of Los Altos Hills. General Plan
and Subdivision Ordinance.
ATTACHMENT 2
���a�i�� 1�►
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR THE FINAL MAP AMENDMENT
LANDS OF WALLACE, STONEBROOK DRIVE
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 336-23-020 & 021
FILE #137-11-MISC.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
1. Any changes or modifications to the approved map shall first be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission and City Council, depending upon the scope of the changes.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
2. This approval shall be of no force or effect until such time as the applicants submit a
mylar amended final map to be reviewed and approved by the Town of Los Altos Hills
City Engineer.
GEOTECHNICAL
3. Future design of a residence shall be based on a geotechnical investigation that provides a
basis for foundation design as well as other geotechnical criteria needed for the design of
site improvements. The project Geotechnical Engineer shall review the findings of site
the geologic investigation and provide a letter to the Town.
ATTACHMENT 3
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
August 24, 2011
L3208B
TO: Brian Froelich RECENED
Planning Department
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS AUG 2 7 2012
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, California 94022 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
SUBJECT: Supplemental Geotechnical Peer Review
RE: Lands of Wallace, Proposed Fault Map Correction
#137-1.1-MISC _ _ .. .... _..... _ _ ..
12400 Stonebrook Drive (previously 12309)
At your request, we have completed a geotechnical peer review of the proposed
Fault Map Correction using:
• Tentative Map (sheet TM -1) prepared by TS, Civil End eenng,
dated August 15, 2012;
• Supplemental Geologic Assessment (letter -report) prepared by
John T. O'Rourke, dated December 13, 2011;
• Geologic Assessment of Potential Fault Risk (report) prepared by
Hydro -Geo Consultants, dated August 1, 2006;
• Geologic and Seismic Hazard Investigation (partial report)
prepared by Burkland and Associates, dated April 7,1977; and
• Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation (report) prepared by
Burkland and Associates, dated May 23,1977.
In addition, we have reviewed pertinent documents and technical maps. from our
office files and observed site test pit exposures.
DISCUSSION.
We understand that the applicant proposes to modify mapped fault trace
alignments across the subject property. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove a
previously identified fault trace in the central portion .of 'the property (based on
Buckland and Associates, 1977) and add a new fault trace in the western portion of the
Northern California Office Central California Office Southern California Office
330 Village Lane 6417 Dogtown Road 550 St. Charles Drive, Suite 108
Los Gatos, CA 95030-7218 San Andreas, CA 95249-9640 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360-3995
(408) 354-5542 a Fax (408) 354-1852 (209) 736-4252 • Fax (209) 736-1212 (805) 497-7999 • Fax (805) 497-7933
I
Brian Froelich
Page 2
August 24, 2012
L3208B
property ("proposed amended fault zone' ori TM -1). Proposed 50 -foot wide building
setbacks (HHBSBL) are depicted from the edges of the amended fault alignment.
In our previous geotechnical peer review (letter dated July 13, 2011) regarding
the subject property, we evaluated the referenced 2006 Geologic Assessment of Potential
Fault Risk (report). We noted that the associated Tentative Map did not illustrate
recommended 50 -foot fault setbacks, and we concluded that additional site subsurface
exploration was needed to potentially eliminate the fault trace depicted by Buckland
and Associates in the central portion of the property.
RECENT GEOLOGIC FINDINGS
The Project Geologist has completed three additional test pits across the fault
trace alignment mapped by Burkland and Associates. Test pits encountered colluvial
soils and unfaulted bedrock materials of the Santa Clara and Monterey Formations. No
Franciscan Complex bedrock was identified as previously logged by Burkland and
Associates. The current Project Geologist recommends that the previously mapped
central fault trace be removed from the subject .property. Based on completed site
subsurface exploration, the consultant concludes that a single trace of the Monta Vista
fault has been identified crossing the western portion of the property (where the pan
handle connects to the main portion of the property). Subsurface exploration has not
been conducted along the central portion of the pan handle driveway.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMNIENDED ACTION
The Project Geologist has adequately completed the additional subsurface
investigation suggested in our previous geotechnical review. Based on collected site
data, we do not have geologic objections to the depiction of the proposed Monta Vista
fault zone modification and associated setbacks illustrated on the referenced Tentative
Map. However, the bar scale and stated 1 inch equals 20 feet scale of the Tentative Map
is not correct. It appears that the correct scale of the property on the Tentative Map may
be 1 inch equals 40 feet. We do not have geotechnical objections to the depicted
Tentative Map if the map scale is corrected.
Future design of a residence at the subject property should be based on a
geotechnical investigation that provides a basis for foundation design as well as other
geotechnical criteria needed for the design of site improvements. The Project
Geotechnical Engineer should review the findings of site geologic investigation.
LL MTATIONS
This supplemental geotechnical peer review has been performed to provide
technical advice to assist the Town with discretionary permit decisions. Our services
have been limited to review of the documents previously identified, and a visual review
of the property. Our opinions and conclusions are made in accordance with generally
■ ilTTI1XT CTTTTT-I- A X- A --V •- -IT
Brian Froelich
Page 3
August 24, 2012
L3208B
accepted principles and practices of the geotechnical profession. This warranty is in lieu
of all other warranties, either expressed or implied.
TS:DTS:kd
Respectfully submitted,
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
TOWN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
Ted Sayre
Principal Engineering Geologist
CEG 1795
David T. Schrier
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
GE 2334
%'/ITTAAr Q"T"TC . - A --v & -roc• .,..�