Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.2 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 14, 1998 Staff Report to the Planning Commission RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW RESIDENCE AND POOL; LANDS OF SILVESTRI; 13925 LA PALOMA ROAD; #144-97-ZP-SD. FROM: Suzanne Davis, Planner SD APPROVED BY: Curtis S. Williams, Planning Dire to) RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission: Approve the requested Site Development Permit, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, including reducing the height to not exceed 23 feet. BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of La Paloma Road, three lots south of Fremont Road and is undeveloped. A 1986 lot line adjustment created the present property boundaries. There are no existing easements on the property, although a 20 foot wide storm drain easement will be granted near the south property line for future drainage improvements. Adjacent properties are all developed with single-family residences and related uses. One lot on the east side of La Paloma is undeveloped, and the former Maurer property to the west will be redeveloped with two new residences if the Zatparvar Subdivision receives final approval of the City Council (scheduled for the January 21, 1998 meeting). CODE REQUIREMENTS As required by Section 10-2.301 of the Site Development Ordinance, this application for a new residence has been forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Criteria for review from the Site Development Ordinance include grading, drainage, building siting, pathways, landscape screening and outdoor lighting. Zoning Code review encompasses compliance with floor and development area requirements, setbacks, height and parking. DISCUSSION Site Data: Gross Lot Area: 1.14 acres Net Lot Area: 1.14 acres Average Slope: 3.4% Lot Unit Factor: 1.14 Planning Commission Lands of Silvestri January 14, 1998 Page 2 Floor Area and Development Area: Area Maximum Proposed Existing Increase Left Development 17,100 15,447 -0- +15,477 +1,653 Floor 6,864 6,779* -0- +6,779 +85 *excludes 2,893 square foot basement that is wholly underground Site and Architecture The applicant is requesting approval of a site development permit for a one-story residence with an attached four-car garage and basement and a swimming pool. The house would be 5,753 square feet, the garage 1,026 square feet, and the basement 2,893 square feet in area. The basement is to be completely underground and is not counted as floor or development area. The length and depth of the window wells and the stairway and exit are minimal. Staff has included wording in condition #1 requiring the window wells to be the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code. Varied roof lines and wall planes, a bay window, eaves and architectural detailing have been proposed to provide interest and shadowing. The proposed residence has also been angled on the site and only a few corners are close to the minimum setbacks. Story poles have been placed on the site for the Commission's review. The maximum height of the new residence is shown to be 23 feet four inches as measured from the building pad. Staff is recommending that the height be reduced to a maximum of 23 feet (see condition#1). This would be consistent with all other recent approvals of new residences in the La Paloma view corridor. A proposed residence on the Lands of Hill was recently denied by the Commission and Council as it exceeded 23 feet and was not consistent with other approvals in the neighborhood. Some properties on La Paloma Road have been required to have greater front setbacks. The following table indicates the setbacks for newer residences fronting on La Paloma Road: Owner Address z: Front Setback Reed 13940 La Paloma Road 55 feet Tsui 13928 La Paloma Road 80 feet Whitney 13890 La Paloma Road 80 feet Shah 13918 La Paloma Road 80 feet Mooring 13791 La Paloma Road 80 feet Stewart 13975 La Paloma Road 50 feet Papoulias 25101 Maurer Lane 50 feet Planning Commission Lands of Silvestri January 14, 1998 Page 3 a, The Tsui, Whitney and Reed properties were all restricted as part of subdivisions that created the lots. These lots are all relatively long in relation to their width. This situation lends itself to having a greater front setback. The Mooring property is also long and narrow. The Shah property has a swale running through the front of the lot that restricts development closer to the street. The applicant's lot is more square in shape and does not have the depth that the other lots with 80 foot setbacks have. The Stewart (north side) and Papoulias (south side) properties are similar to the applicant's lot in size and shape. These immediate neighbors both have 50 foot setbacks from La Paloma Road. If the applicants are required to set their home back 50 feet from the front property line, the three homes would all have the same setback and would appear more lined up. If the applicants are required to set the house back more than 50 feet, the rear yard would be reduced, making it difficult to have a usable outdoor space that is not in front of the house and visible from the street. For these reasons, staff supports the front setback as proposed. The house would be angled slightly and would be off set from the two adjacent homes as proposed. Proposed exterior materials include stucco siding and window reveals, brick veneer accent, wrought iron railings and slate roofing. Four small skylights are planned. The front entry is 17 feet high, and is about six feet lower than the main roof behind it. Exterior colors have not yet been chosen. Staff will review proposed colors for conformance with the Town's adopted color board,prior to the painting of the residence. There is ample development area remaining for future projects, as recommended by the Design Guidelines, although there would be less than 100 square feet of floor area left. Staff has included a condition requiring a disclosure statement to be recorded stating that the floor area is close to the maximum allowed by the Town. Driveway & Parking The driveway from the property line to the garage is 14 feet wide as requested by the Fire Department. The garage entry will not be seen from the street as recommended by the Town's Design Guidelines. The Zoning Ordinance requires at least four on-site parking spaces which have been provided in the garage. In addition, a two-car parking bay has been proposed for guest parking. There would also be a small area of turf block adjacent to the driveway to facilitate maneuvering of vehicles and to allow an additional car to park. Other than this small area of turf block and a short section of walkway, no other pavement is proposed within setbacks. Outdoor Lighting The proposed lighting for the exterior of the house is shown on the floor plans (sheet A2). Lighting has been limited to one fixture per exit with two at the garage. A detail of the proposed fixtures is also included on sheet A2. Staff recommends that the exterior Planning Commission Lands of Silvestri January 14, 1998 Page 4 lighting be approved as submitted. Any landscape lighting will be considered at a site development hearing along with the landscape plan. Trees & Landscaping There are a number of existing orchard trees on the site, most of which will be removed for development of the new residence. The Environmental Design & Protection Committee would like to have some of the orchard trees on the site saved. Seven trees around the perimeter of the site will be retained, as shown on the architectural site plan. The Committee also commented that riparian plantings are preferred along the creek channel. New landscaping will be needed around the residence, particularly on south side to help screen the house from the adjacent neighbors, and in front to provide screening from the street. A landscape screening plan will be reviewed at a site development hearing once the house is framed. The Environmental Design Committee will review the planting plan at that time. Any planting required for screening or erosion control will be required to be planted prior to final inspection. Grading &Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the plans and has recommended conditions of approval as specified in Attachment 1. Proposed grading includes 1,570 cubic yards of cut, and 760 cubic yards of fill. The basement excavation is 900 cubic yards of the cut amount. The extra material will be exported from the site. Drainage in the La Paloma Basin has been of great concern to residents in recent years. The Town has a planned Capital Improvement Plan to improve the drainage in the area. Portions of the channel improvements will be done with the Zatparvar Subdivision improvements. The applicants will be responsible for installing the improvements on their property. Since the applicants will be installing the piped portion of the storm drain improvements west of La Paloma Road, staff recommends that the storm drainage fee normally charged with building permit fees be waived. The City Engineer has negotiated with neighbors and the applicants over a two year period to work out the details of the channel and pipline alignment and related drainage improvements. The granting of storm drain easements by some residents was contingent on the alignment and location of the pipe relative to the channel. The applicants will install a 48-inch storm drain line parallel to the south property line. The pipe will then bisect the corner of the Lands of Pefley where it will daylight into an open channel that runs along the Lands of Zatparvar(formerly Maurer)to Fremont Road. On-site drainage will also include a series of catch basins that will collect water from around the house and the driveway. The piped water will be directed to the new storm drain line. The Engineering Department will review and approve the final drainage improvement plans prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. Final "as-built" grading and drainage will be inspected by the Engineering Department, and any deficiencies will be required to be corrected prior to final inspection. Proposed grading is generally within Planning Commission Lands of Silvestri January 14, 1998 Page 5 — - the limits of the Town grading policy. There are some areas where the fill would exceed the recommended three feet. This is being done to allow gravity flow to the sewer line. The construction of the underground pipe from La Paloma to the edge of the Pefley property would require grading within 10 feet of the property line. This is not considered a variance since the grading would be done to construct drainage improvements within storm drain easements. One small area of re-contouring would occur just outside the easement,but is necessary to underground the pipe. Fire Department Review The Santa Clara County Fire Department reviewed the plans and has determined that the flow capacity of the nearest fire hydrant will not be adequate for a home of the proposed size, and fire sprinklers or other acceptable water supply will be required. The Fire Department also noted that if the property is fenced, emergency access will need to be provided. The Fire Department recommendations have been included as conditions in Attachment 1. Standard requirements for driveway construction and placement of the property address so that it is visible from the street have also been included. Committee Review The Pathways Committee has requested that a Type IIB path be constructed along La Paloma Road (see Attachment 4). As stated in Council Resolution #38-96, La Paloma Road is designated for pathways on both sides of the street. Condition #17 requires the path to be installed prior to final inspection. The comments from the Environmental Design Committee were discussed above in the landscape section of this report. The proposed project is below the allowable floor and development area for the property, and appears to be in compliance with the Design Guidelines and the requirements of the Zoning and Site Development Ordinances. The lower profile design and height of 23 feet (as conditioned by staff) is consistent with other approvals for new residences in the La Paloma view corridor. Staff is available to answer any questions that the Commission or the public may have. Planning Commission + Lands of Silvestri January 14, 1998 Page 6 ATTACHMENTS 1. Recommended conditions of approval 2. Santa Clara County Fire Department comments, dated July 18, 1997 (one page) 3. Environmental Design & Protection Committee evaluation, received July 9, 1997 (one page). 4. Pathway Committee recommendation(one page) 5. Worksheet#2 6. Development plans: site, floor and roof plans, elevations and sections (eight sheets) cc: Chet&Irene Silvestri 21166 Haymeadow Drive Saratoga, CA 95070 Jeff Lea Lea& Sung Engineering,Inc. 26229 Eden Landing Road, Suite 2 Hayward, CA 94545 Bob Flury Design Group 20 S. Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite 104 Los Gatos, CA 95030 ATTACHMENT 1 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR NEW RESIDENCE AND POOL LANDS OF SILVESTRI - 13935 LA PALOMA ROAD A. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 1. The basement exiting and window wells shall be the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code. The maximum height of the residence shall not exceed 23 feet as measured from the existing grade or the building pad, whichever is lower. Revised plans shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department,prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. Any other changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Planning Director or the Planning Commission, depending upon the scope of the changes. 2. Subsequent to fmal framing, a landscape screening and erosion control plan shall be reviewed by the Site Development Committee. Particular attention shall be given to plantings which will be adequate to break up the view of the new residence from surrounding properties and streets. All landscaping required for screening purposes or for erosion control (as determined by the City Engineer) must be installed prior to fmal inspection, unless the Planning Director finds that unusual circumstances, such as weather or site conditions, require that planting be delayed. In those instances, a deposit of an amount equal to the cost of landscape materials and installation,to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, shall be submitted to the Town. Landscaping shall in any event be installed not later than six months after final inspection, or the deposit will be forfeited. 3. A landscape maintenance deposit (or certificate of deposit), equal to the cost of materials and installation for all landscaping required for screening purposes or for erosion control (as determined by the City Engineer), but not to exceed $5,000, shall be posted prior to final inspection. An inspection of the landscape to ensure adequate establishment and maintenance shall be made two years after installation. The deposit will be released at that time if the plantings remain viable. 4. Paint colors shall be chosen by the applicant and approved by staff in conformance with the Town's adopted color board, and shall exhibit a light reflectivity value of 50 or less. Roofs shall use materials which have a light reflectivity value of 40 or less. White trim area should be minimized, particularly on large surfaces such as doors, columns, railings, and trellises. Color samples shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to acceptance of plans for building plan Recommended Conditions Lands of Silvestri Page 8 check. All applicable structures shall be painted in conformance with the approved color(s)prior to final inspection. 5. Skylights shall be designed and constructed to reduce emitted light. Skylights shall be flat and no lighting may be placed within skylight wells. 6. Fire retardant roofing is required for the new construction. 7. . At the time of foundation inspection, the location, and elevation of the new residence shall be certified in writing by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor as being in/at the approved location and elevation shown on the approved site development plan. At the time of framing, the height of the structure shall be similarly certified as being at the height shown on the approved site development plan. The hardscape and driveway locations shall also be certified at time of installation. 8. Exterior lighting fixtures shown on the site plan are approved. Any additional outdoor lighting or changes to the lighting plan requires approval by the Planning Department prior to installation. Lighting specifications shall be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. Lighting shall be down shielded, low wattage, shall not encroach or reflect on adjacent properties, and the source of the lighting shall not be visible from off the site. No lighting may be placed within setbacks except for two driveway or entry lights. 9. A disclosure statement shall be recorded stating that the floor area established by the approval of this permit is close to the maximum allowable level of development allowed by the Town. The disclosure statement will be prepared by the Planning Department and shall be signed and notarized by the property owners prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. 10. Standard swimming pool requirements: a. Lights shall be designed so that the source is not visible from off-site. b. Drainage outfall structures shall be constructed and located to the satisfaction of the Town Engineering Inspector. c. Fencing or a locking pool cover is recommended for safety. d. Equipment shall be enclosed on all four sides for noise mitigation, and the enclosure shall be screened with landscaping. The pool equipment enclosure may not encroach into any required setbacks. Recommended Conditions Lands of Silvestri Page 9 B. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: 11. The site drainage associated with the proposed development must be designed as surface flow wherever possible to avoid concentration of the runoff. The proposed drainage shall be designed to maintain the existing flow patterns. Storm drain improvement plans which include construction drawings for the entire proposed Town storm drain system, and a final grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by the Engineering Department prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. Final drainage and grading shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and any deficiencies corrected to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to final inspection. A letter shall be submitted from the project engineer stating that the drainage improvements were installed as shown on the approved plans and in accordance with their recommendations prior to final inspection. 12. The applicants shall construct, at their expense, the piped portion of the Town's proposed storm drain system beginning at the easterly property line of the applicants' property and ending at the outlet of the pipe. The applicants' engineer shall perform the final design of the entire Town storm drain system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall also prepare the construction plans for the entire system, but the applicants will only be responsible for their prorated cost of design, survey and construction inspection. The costs shall be prorated based upon the length of the system crossing the applicant's property in relation to the length of the entire system from the inlet on the east side of La Paloma Road to the outlet at Fremont Road. The remainder of the design, survey and inspection costs shall be paid for by the Town and the subdivider at 26170 Fremont Road using the same criteria. The storm drain fee normally charged at the time of building permit issuance shall be waived. 13. Any, and all, changes to the approved grading and drainage plan shall be submitted as revisions from the project engineer and shall first be approved by the Town Engineering Department. No grading shall take place during the grading moratorium (November 1 to April 1) except with prior approval from the City Engineer. No grading shall take place within ten feet of any property line except to allow for the construction of the driveway access. 14. All public utility services serving this property shall be placed underground. 15. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. The contractor and the property owner shall comply Recommended Conditions Lands of Silvestri Page 10 with all appropriate requirements of the Town's NPDES permit relative to grading and erosion/sediment control. The first 100 feet of the driveway shall be rocked during construction and all cut and fill slopes shall be protected from erosion. All areas on the site that have the native soil disturbed shall be protected for erosion control during the rainy season and shall be replanted prior to final inspection. 16. Two copies of a grading and construction operation plan shall be submitted by the property owner for review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check The grading/construction plan shall address truck traffic issues regarding dust, noise, and vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety on La Paloma Road and surrounding roadways; storage of construction materials; placement of sanitary facilities; clean-up area; parking for construction vehicles; and parking for construction personnel. A debris box (trash dumpster) shall be placed on site for collection of construction debris. Arrangements must be made with the Los Altos Garbage Company for the debris box, since they have a franchise with the Town and no other hauler is allowed within the Town limits. 17. The property owner shall inform the Town of any damage and shall repair any damage caused by the construction of the project to pathways, private driveways, and public and private roadways, prior to final inspection and release of occupancy permits and shall provide the Town with photographs of the existing conditions of the roadways and pathways prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check 18. A Type IIB path shall be constructed along the property frontage to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department, prior to final inspection. The driveway shall be roughened where it crosses the path and planting and irrigation shall be a minimum of five feet from the path. 19. The driveway shall be required to be fully constructed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,prior to final inspection. 20. The property owner shall be required to connect to public sanitary sewer prior to final inspection. 21. A 20 foot wide storm drain easement shall be granted as shown on the grading and drainage plan dated December 29, 1997, or as otherwise modified and approved by the City Engineer. A plat and legal description prepared by a licensed land surveyor shall be submitted for preparation of the grant document. The property owners shall return the signed notarized document to the Town prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. Recommended Conditions Lands of Silvestri Page 11 22. Building permits for the new residence and pool shall not be issued until construction of the downstream storm drainage channel and the pipe crossing the applicants property have commenced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If the downstream improvements and the pipe crossing the applicants' property have not been completed within sixty days of commencement, construction of the applicant's new residence and pool project shall cease until such time that these storm drain improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT 23. The driveway shall be a minimum of 14 feet wide, shall have a vertical clearance of 13 feet six inches, shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (40,000 pounds) and shall have an all weather surface. 24. The property address shall be placed on the property so that it is clearly visible and legible from La Paloma Road. The address numbers shall be a minimum of four inches high and shall contrast with the background color. 25. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system approved by the Santa Clara County Fire Department shall be included in the new residence. The details of the sprinkler system shall be included with construction plans. The plans shall be stamped and signed by the Fire Department and submitted to the Town, prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check, and the sprinklers shall be inspected and approved by the Fire Department, prior to final inspection. The applicant may propose alternate means of achieving an acceptable water supply in lieu of fire sprinklers, subject to the approval of the Fire Department. 26. If the front of the property is fenced, the plans shall be approved by the Santa Clara County Fire Department, prior to issuance of a building permit. Any gates shall be approved by the Fire Department, and may be required to have a KNOX or other approved access system, as determined by the Fire Department. Upon completion of the construction, a final inspection shall be required to be set with the Planning and Engineering Departments two weeks prior to final building inspection approval. CONDITION NUMBERS 1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 AND 25 SHALL BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED OFF BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PLAN CHECK BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. Recommended Conditions Lands of Silvestri Page 12 Properties residing within the Los Altos School District boundaries must pay School District fees before receiving their building permit from Los Altos Hills. The applicant must take a copy of Worksheet #2 to both the elementary and high school district offices, pay the appropriate fees and provide the Town with a copy of their receipts. NOTE: The Site Development permit is valid for one year from the approval date (until January 14, 1999). All required building permits must be obtained within that year and work on items not requiring a building permit shall be commenced within one year and completed within two years. ATTACH AE KIT 6 °o FIRE DEPARTMENT 01• 31( A SANTA CLARA COUNTY CONTROL NUMBER ESi 1567, 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 9500-1818 BLDG PERMIT NUMBER COURTESY BSERVICE (408) 378-4010 (phone) • (408) 378-9342 (fax) PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 9 7- 19 4 9 FILE NUMBER 14 4-9 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. SHEET NO. REQUIREMENT Review of site plan for a new 9,553 square foot single family residence. uFc 1. Required Fire Flow: Required fire flow for this project is 2750 GPM at 20 psi Appendix III-A residual pressure. The required fire flow is not available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. UFC 2. Required Fire Flow Option (Single Family Dwellings): Provide required fire 903.2 flow from fire hydrants spaced at a maximum of 500 feet OR Provide an approved fire sprinkler system throughout all portions of the building. The fire sprinkler system shall conform to National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D, 1994 Edition, and local ordinance requirements. ApCendix 3. Final Required Fire Flow: Required fire flow may be reduced up to 50% in III-A buildings equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems but, can be no less Section 5 than 1500 GPM. Therefore, the final required fire flow is 1500 GPM at 20 psi. residual pressure. This flow shall be taken from any two fire hydrants, on or near the site so long as they are spaced at a maximum spacing of 250 feet. 4. It is noted that there are no fence line nor gates reflected in submittal. Should there be future plans for gates or fence lines along the La Paloma Road frontage, compliance with our standard G-1 (attached) will be required. Additionally, if fence line is planned along the La Paloma Road frontage, this department may request personnel access gate(s) to be included within that fence line. DISTRICT PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST.TYPE PERMITTEE DATE PAGE 0 0 0 0 0 THE BOB FLURY DESIGN GROUP 07/18/97 1 of 1 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY Residential Development Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT LOCATION SFR-SILVESTRI 13935 La Paloma Rd A California Fire Protection District serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos,Los Altos Hills,Los Gatos, Monte Sereno,Morgan Hill,and Saratoga ktfl ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COMMITTEE Pa A.e% NEW RESIDENCE EVALUATION • JUL 181991 ' Applicant's Name: ��L v�sT,�/ Inn OF LOS;glras Hf1i� Address: / 3 9 35-- LA -14',-,....,412")& ""412")& 'tea . Date: C/ / /3 /997 Reviewed by: Existing Trees: (Comment on size, type, condition, location with respect to building site. Recommended protection during construction.) 4 c/'• '' %' . 2V ofdagp- • Proposed Grading: (Impact on water table, nearby vegetation. Erosion potential. All • grading at least 10' from property line?) • Creeks and drainage: (Should a conservation easement be recommended? Sufficient space between house and conservation easement for circulation. Will construction impact wildlife migration (bridges, fences)? Is there a need for removal of invasive species?) • q� �} 4t-.14.,), ! 4 jje ��t." •/ yl..- `(,AI /fir ,_,�..1 f _.y1.T M G� �� L- JI T ..e. `_ ,'` j b�/Ria Y; ! G.J .+ ka.. •iY Siting: (View impact: ridgeline, across valley, on neighbors. Will driveway impact neighbors' privacy (lights, noise)? Recommended mitigation (height, color, landscape).) - • • yt/E LLS r' Sf ice ./c.��'i , Other Comments: LCIi�.._' "�t..,.. . _ 1� "Llree,c3 Ti.✓J'�i�. ATT A<c A r Ll- easement with the pathway slope not 12631 Miraloma Way;Lands of Breetwor. exceeding 15%. 5/27/97 Restore II-B path along Summerhill and 14400 Kingsley Way;Lands of Clevenger. construct II-B path along Miraloma with Construct II-B paths along Altadena the drainage ditch between the path and Drive and Kingsley Way. 3/24/97 the road. 2/24/97 13001 La Cresta; Lands of Hsiao: No 27371 Moody Road; Lands of Rocchetti& request. 2/24/97 HerdelL• Construct II-B path along Moody 25309 Li :yma; Lands of Loughmiller. Road on the property side of the ditch and acquire a road and pathway Constru.:t a native path in a 10 foot easement:.along the southern boundary easementh8as needed to encompass the p of the.i.i. perty from the water tank path. 7/28/97 access road to the southwest corner of 26075 Newbridge Drive;Lands of the property. Provide pathway easement Critchfield: Restore Il-B paths along La over the access road. 5/27/97 amended Paloma and Newbridge. 5/27/97 6/23/97 24021 Oak Knoll Circle;Lands of J.Lohr 13870 La Paloma Road; Lands of Hill: Properties: No request. 2/24/97 Restore.II-B path along La Paloma. 24036 Oak Knoll Circle; Lands of J. Lohr 6/23/97 Properties: Restore II-B path along Oak a13935 La Paloma Road; Lands of Knoll Circle. 1/9/97 Silvestri: Construct II-B path along La 24044 Oak Knoll Circle; Lands of Lohr Paloma. 7/28/97 Restore II-B path along Oak Knoll Circle. 25703 Lomita Linda Court; Lands of 4/28/97 Stitt: Construct II-13 path along 24052 Oak Knoll Circle; Lands of Lohr: Ravensbury Avenue that deals with the Restore II-B path along Oak Knoll Circle. drainage problems there. 3/24/97 5/27/97 10699 Magdalena Road; Lands of Urbach: 12113 Oak Park Court;Lands of Lohr. No request. 6/23/97 Restore II-B path along Oak Park Court. 11240 Magdalena Road; Lands of Hu: 6/23/97 Restore II-B path along Magdalena. 12117 Oak Park Court; Lands of J. Lohr 3/24/97 Properties: Restore II-B path along Oak 28625 Matadero Creek Court Lands of Park Court. 2/24/97 Groff 8cTaylor: Construct a native path 12129 Oak Park Court; Lands of Prime in a 10 foot easement along the Home Development: Provide either a boundary with 28620 Matadero Creek pathway easement covering the entire Court so as to connect the cul-de-sac to human habitation setback or an the existing path on the lower portion of easement 15 feet wide beginning on the property. Restore the latter path. southern boundary of the property at a 4/28/97 point 100 feet from the southeast 28500 Matadero Creek Lane; Lands of corner and proceeding in a northerly Ruiner: Restore II-B path along Matadero direction with a slope in the direction of Creek Lane. 7/28/97 travel not to exceed 10%and connecting 28510 Matadero Creek Lane; Lands of with the existing pathway easement Jain: Restore JI-B path along Matadero along the eastern boundary. 6/23/97 Creek Lane and the asphalt path above 26700 Palo Hills Drive;Lands of Scifres: Page Mill Road. 2/24/97 Replace existing asphalt path along 12205 Menalto Drive; Lands of Godinha Fremont Road and Palo Hills Drive with a NoII B path. 5/27/97 request. 6/23/97 26666 Snell Lane; Lands of Orton: No request. 7/28/97 RESOLUTION #38-9$ A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS DESIGNATING CERTAIN ROADS TO HAVE PATHWAYS ON BOTH SIDES BE IT RESOLVED: In accordance with Policy A2 of the Pathway Element of the General Plan, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills has determined that the following streets shall be planned with pathways on both sides of the street. The following streets have sufficient traffic (auto, pedestrian and equetrian) to warrant paths on both sides. While desirable there may be segments where creating the path is not economically feasible at this time. Nevertheless, the Town will take the easement and should it become important, the Town will put in the path. 1. Fremont Road 2. El Monte Road from Summerhill Road to Stonebrook 3. Manuella Road from Fremont to Scarff - 4. La Paloma Road from Fremont to Purissima Road 5. Concepcion Road from Fremont to Purissima Road 6. Purissima Road from Arastradero to Robleda Road 7. Page Mill Road 8. Altamont Road 9. Moody Road PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May 1996. B y 141 --- Mayor ATTEST • �- tact 1 �.,-k(... -LN1.1 RECEIVED ( r. . JUL 091997 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 26379 Fremont Road•Los Altos Hills,California 94022•(415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160 WORKSHEET #2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FLOOR AREA • TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION • PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ev(4.4s41,. .1 PROPERTY ADDRESS (-*`13S LA-"Prkc.omile CALCULATED BY j,i. , 5t.a,rN+ - e w+a 'bv13, w� 5i4� tzcu DATE f -s z' .1 - 9 -47 / e_e__b. r /96 1. DEVELOPMENT AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE) Existing Proposed Total (Additions or Deletions) A. House and Garage (from Part 2.A.) 4, 7 7 g 67, 779 B. Desk* Evv+wy walk_ — -5-5-5. 0 - 0 C. Driveway and Parking3 O 5 q • (Measured 100'along centerline) -- __2._,g4- --&-q0— -1 D. Patios and Walkways ( (Lear) -- Z-73-570- 9/9 —2 3SO- '21() E. f wo vi,+ Go ur+y av&. -- 1-019 395 -}-09- F. Pool and Decking — -i-r8q-0 y 35,c3- -17041-o 93?-7:3 G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) H. Any other coverage o i ei vu:P,mk.Rx- -- - ( ('7 ' I 1 q e_riciosi,c„s-2--- TOTALS — -4.7 9 zE -44]-5e4- I!SI Lic(' • 15 LyJ Maximum Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet#1) ' I'I,Oa5 yi 2. FLOOR AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE) Existing Proposed Total (Additions or Deletions) A. House and Garage N g e. 10.#=1,1cE a. 1st Floor — 57 53 6", -753 b. 2ndFloor - c. Attic and Basement .v - 1 e _ ( ��D/�-' -, 1.)_ - � J (ZN") d. Garage is 02(0 it Dzcp B. Accessory Buildings a. 1st Floor — b. 2nd Floor _ _ — c. Attic and Basement _ — — TOTALS — Co. -77 9 lo, -77q Maximum Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet#1) (a/ 0 59-la TOWN USE ONLY CHECKED BY c51 .. rine_•(-,cW1,sS -DA'Z'E bl l Imo) ` i ,,' end ' 1-1) (c,1 Revised 2/26/96